Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139993›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement.

Horacio J Asbun, Jony Van Hilst, Levan Tsamalaidze, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Dominic Sanford, Lucio Pereira, Marc G Besselink, John A Stauffer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06141044 (PANDREAS. Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage vs no Drainage After Distal Pancreatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06141044 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

PANDREAS. Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage vs no Drainage After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Multicentre Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraRan2024 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsPostoperative Pancreatic Fistula, Distal Pancreatectomy, DrainageArmsAvoid surgical drainage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Counter-Clockwise Approach for Robotic Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  13. HOW TO PERFORM LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY USING THE CLOCKWISE TECHNIQUE.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Horacio J AsbunSurgical Oncology Miami Cancer Institute, 8900 N Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, USA. asbun.horacio@mayo.edu.
Jony Van HilstDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Levan TsamalaidzeGeneral Surgery Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Yoshikuni KawaguchiHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Dominic SanfordHPB Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Lucio PereiraGeneral Surgery Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John A StaufferGeneral Surgery Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Amsterdam · NLWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has proven advantages over its open counterpart and is becoming more frequently performed around the world. It still remains a difficult operation due to the retroperitoneal location of the pancreas and limited experience and training with the procedure. In addition, complications such as bleeding or postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remain a problem. A standardized approach to LDP with stepwise graded compression technique for pancreatic transection has been utilized at a single center, and we sought to describe the technique and determine the outcomes.

methodsA review of all patients undergoing LDP by a clockwise approach including the graded compression technique from August 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017 was performed. An external audit was performed by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group.

resultsOverall, 260 patients with a mean age and a BMI of 62.3 and 28, respectively, underwent LDP using this technique. Mean operative time and blood loss were 183 min and 248 mL, respectively,. Hand-assisted method and conversion to open were both 5%. Major morbidity and mortality were 9.2% and 0.4%, respectively,. POPF was noted in 8.1%. The technical steps include (1) mobilization of the splenic flexure of the colon and exposure of the pancreas, (2) dissection along the inferior edge of the pancreas and choosing the site for pancreatic division, (3) pancreatic parenchymal division using a progressive stepwise compression technique with staple line reinforcement, (4) ligation of the splenic vein and artery, (5) dissection along the superior edge of the pancreas and residual posterior attachments, and (6) mobilization of the spleen and specimen removal.

conclusionLDP with a clockwise approach for dissection, combined with the progressive stepwise compression technique for pancreatic transection, resulted in excellent outcomes including a very low POPF rate.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalClinical AuditFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingLaparoscopic distal pancreatectomyLaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31139993
OpenAlexW2947718532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.