Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139971›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Synthetic T2 mapping is correlated with time from stroke onset: a future tool in wake-up stroke management?

Thomas Duchaussoy, Jean-François Budzik, Laurene Norberciak, Lucie Colas, Marta Pasquini, Sebastien Verclytte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Characterizing Protein Concentration in Cerebrospinal Fluid with TMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluating T1, T2 Relaxation, and Proton Density in Normal Brain Using Synthetic MRI with Fast Imaging Protocol.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A Comparison of TJournal of central nervous system disease · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas DuchaussoyImaging Department, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, F-59000, Lille, France.
Jean-François BudzikImaging Department, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, F-59000, Lille, France.
Laurene NorberciakBiostatistics Department - Delegations for Clinical Research and Innovation, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, F-59000, Lille, France.
Lucie ColasImaging Department, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, F-59000, Lille, France.
Marta PasquiniDepartment of Neurology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, F-59000, Lille, France.
Sebastien VerclytteImaging Department, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, F-59000, Lille, France. sverclytte@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-1904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFLAIR-DWI mismatch is an effective method to select eligible wake-up stroke (WUS) patients for intravenous thrombolysis, but shows limitations in the case of subtle FLAIR hyperintensities. T2 mapping is a quantitative method, directly generated from synthetic MRI, which provides T2 relaxation times. We aimed to assess the correlation between T2 values and onset time in acute stroke patients.

methodsWe prospectively included stroke patients in the 4.5-h window undergoing brain MRI including MAGnetic resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) from March to October 2017. T2 relaxation times and FLAIR signal intensities were measured in ischemic and contralateral nonischemic regions to calculate FLAIR signal intensity ratio (rSI), difference, and ratio of T2 values. Correlation analysis with time from the onset was achieved using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) test.

resultsForty-two patients were included. The strongest correlation with the time from onset was the difference in T2 relaxation times (ρ = 0.71; CI95% = [0.48; 0.85]), followed by the ratio (ρ = 0.65; CI95% = [0.37; 0.82]) and the absolute T2 relaxation time (ρ = 0.4; CI95% = [0.06; 0.66]), whereas the FLAIR rSI showed the weakest correlation (ρ = 0.18; CI95% = [- 0.16-0.51]).

conclusionsThe difference and ratio in T2 relaxation times were correlated with the onset time in stroke patients in the 4.5-h window. T2 mapping generated from synthetic MRI may become a relevant tool to select WUS patients with subtle FLAIR hyperintensities. Given that no definitive statement can be made about its usefulness in the 4.5-h windows, further study including patients with an onset time > 4.5 h is required. KEY POINTS: • The difference and ratio in T2 relaxation times are each individually correlated with the time from stroke onset in the 4.5-h window. • FLAIR rSI showed a poor correlation with the time from stroke onset. • T2 mapping, directly generated from synthetic MRI, may be a suitable quantitative marker to select safely WUS patients with subtle FLAIR hyperintensities for intravenous thrombolysis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedBrainBrain IschemiaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesThrombolytic TherapyTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentAcute strokeMagnetic resonance imagingStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.