ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019
[Optical coherence tomography angiography in intensive care medicine : A new field of application?]
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical coherence tomography angiography in septic shock: a new frontier in microcirculation assessment.Critical care science · 2025Article
- Ocular perfusion in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction measured by optical coherence tomography angiography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Article
- [Optical coherence tomography angiography and cardiovascular diseases. An overview of the current knowledge].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany critically ill patients show a disturbance of the microcirculation, which is not yet regularly examined in the clinical routine; however, for treatment decisions and estimation of the prognosis it would be important to obtain detailed information about the microcirculation in critically ill patients. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a non-invasive, contact-free technique, which enables visualization of the blood flow in the retinal microcirculation within a few seconds. Therefore, it may have the potential to diagnose microcirculation disorders in critically ill patients.
objectiveThe aims of the study were to assess the importance of the microcirculation in intensive care medicine, a comparison of the methods of video microscopy and OCTA and analysis of preclinical and clinical data on the use of OCTA in intensive care medicine. MATERIAL AND
methodsA selective literature review and data analysis were carried out.
resultsA direct visualization of the microcirculation has been possible for many years with the technique of video microscopy but this has not become established in the clinical routine due to the susceptibility to interferences and a time-consuming manual analysis. The OCTA is a non-invasive and contact-free method for the visualization of retinal blood flow. First preclinical data in septic and hemorrhagic shock show good results of OCTA for analysis of the microcirculation.
conclusionThe non-invasive technique of OCTA is a promising measurement method to enable bedside analysis of the microcirculation in critically ill paients in the future; however, some technical limitations must still be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31139886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.