ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2019
Normal T
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Intrapancreatic Fat Deposition on Regional and Total Pancreatic T1 Relaxation Times at 3.0 Tesla MRI.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- T1 Mapping of the Abdomen, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025Review
- Whole pancreas water TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Practical approach to quantitative liver and pancreas MRI in children.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Advances in MRI of Chronic Pancreatitis.Advances in clinical radiology · 2024Article
- T1 and T2-mapping in pancreatic MRI: Current evidence and future perspectives.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional imaging of the pancreas in diabetes.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Multiparametric quantitative MRI of healthy adult pancreas: correlations with gender and age.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Quantitative MRI of chronic pancreatitis: results from a multi-institutional prospective study, magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive method for assessment of pancreatic fibrosis (MINIMAP).Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Histopathologic correlation of pancreatic fibrosis with pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging quantitative metrics and Cambridge classification.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- T1 mapping for the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: correlation with Cambridge classification system.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Advanced MR Imaging of the Pancreas.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2020Review
- Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Review
- Cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring of chronic pancreatitis: why it is necessary and how it can be done.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Review
- Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas of Individuals With Diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDetermine normal T SUBJECTS AND
methodsWe imaged 120 healthy subjects (age range 20-78 years) who are on annual screening with MRI/MRCP for the possibility of pancreatic cancer. Subjects had a predisposition to develop pancreatic cancer, but no history of pancreas disease or acute symptoms. Equal number (n = 60) of subjects were scanned on either 1.5 T or 3 T scanner using dual flip angle spoiled gradient echo technique incorporating fat suppression and correction for B
resultsMedian T
conclusionThis study measured the median T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.