Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139642›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2019

A History of Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery: What Have We Learnt?

H Michael Mayer

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolving Role of Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review.International journal of spine surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Access to the Lumbosacral Spine: A Current View.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024
    Article
  16. Advances and Challenges of Endoscopic Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H Michael MayerSpine Center, Schön Klinik München Harlaching, Academic Teaching Hospital, Harlachinger Str. 51, 81547 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2555-8126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new development and finally the general acceptance of surgical techniques among the worldwide surgical community sometimes create fascinating stories. This is also true for the history of endoscopic lumbar spine surgery. In the last 100 years there was a "natural" evolution of surgical techniques with continuous improvement and "refinement" of lumbar decompression techniques towards less invasive operations with the final "endpoint" of microsurgery. However the application of percutaneous, image-guided, and endoscopic technologies has revolutionized minimally invasive surgery. This article describes the history of endoscopic lumbar spine surgery and its major milestones and protagonists which have helped to make endoscopic lumbar spine surgery "disruptive" minimally invasive surgical technology which has changed the world of lumbar decompression surgery. "The past is the mother of the future"Henri Cartier Bresson, French Photographer, 1908-2004.

Indexed as

EndoscopyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansLumbar VertebraeMicrosurgeryOrthopedic Procedures

Identifiers

PMID31139642
PMCPMC6470418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.