ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019
Evaluation of PET/CT in patients with stage III malignant cutaneous melanoma.
Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound Surveillance in Melanoma Management: Bridging Diagnostic Promise with Real-World Adherence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [European radiology · 2021Article
- Melanoma Radiological Surveillance: A Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Challenges.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to evaluate if patients with stage III-IV MCM are eligible for curative treatment PET/CT is performed. Since the diagnostic value of PET/CT is not unambiguously, a retrospective cohort study is performed to tailor optimal indication of PET/CT in patients with stage III MCM. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients with stage III disease in a large oncologic teaching hospital in which PET/CT was performed from 2012 to 2016. The primary tumor- and regional lymph node characteristics were assessed to predict distant metastasis seen on PET/CT. A total of 73 patients were included of which 18% were restaged as stage IV by PET/CT. Twenty percent of the patients with a positive lymph node and 14% of patients with in transit metastasis or satellite lesions were restaged to stage IV. T-classification, ulceration and N-classification did not predict distant metastasis. Localization of the primary tumor significantly differed (P = 0.004). Localization on the head/neck resulted in a 32 greater odds of distant metastasis (P = 0.008). After a median follow-up of 36 months, 13 out of 60 (27%) stage III MCM patients were restaged as stage IV after the first performed PET/CT. This retrospective cohort study resulted in restaging of 18% of the stage III MCM patients by PET/CT, with therapeutic consequences. Patients with stage III MCM on the head/neck seem to have more distant spreading of the tumor than other localizations. Further investigation is needed, with larger sample sizes, to guide optimal indication of PET/CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31139499PMC6526367W3005614695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.