Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139443›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2019

Because space matters: conceptual framework to help distinguish slum from non-slum urban areas.

Richard Lilford, Catherine Kyobutungi, Robert Ndugwa, Jo Sartori, Samuel I Watson, Richard Sliuzas, Monika Kuffer, Timothy Hofer, Joao Porto de Albuquerque, Alex Ezeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trends and Inequalities in Maternal and Newborn Health Services for Unplanned Settlements of Lusaka City, Zambia.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard LilfordWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Catherine KyobutungiAfrican Population and Health Research Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
Robert NdugwaGlobal Urban Observatory Unit, United Nations Human Settlements Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jo SartoriWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Samuel I WatsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Richard SliuzasFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Monika KufferFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Timothy HoferInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Joao Porto de AlbuquerqueInstitute for Global Sustainable Development, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-3168
Alex EzehDornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite an estimated one billion people around the world living in slums, most surveys of health and well-being do not distinguish between slum and non-slum urban residents. Identifying people who live in slums is important for research purposes and also to enable policymakers, programme managers, donors and non-governmental organisations to better target investments and services to areas of greatest deprivation. However, there is no consensus on what a slum is let alone how slums can be distinguished from non-slum urban precincts. Nor has attention been given to a more fine-grained classification of urban spaces that might go beyond a simple slum/non-slum dichotomy. The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework to help tackle the related issues of slum definition and classification of the urban landscape. We discuss:The concept of space as an epidemiological variable that results in 'neighbourhood effects'.The problems of slum area definition when there is no 'gold standard'.A long-list of variables from which a selection must be made in defining or classifying urban slum spaces.Methods to combine any set of identified variables in an operational slum area definition.Two basic approaches to spatial slum area definitions-top-down (starting with a predefined area which is then classified according to features present in that area) and bottom-up (defining the areal unit based on its features).Different requirements of a slum area definition according to its intended use.Implications for research and future development.

Indexed as

definitionidentificationmappingslumsurban

Identifiers

PMID31139443
PMCPMC6509608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.