Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139420›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2019

Effects of a tailored strength training program of the upper limb combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in chronic stroke patients: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.

Marie-Hélène Milot, Stephania Palimeris, Hélène Corriveau, François Tremblay, Marie-Hélène Boudrias

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02915185 (Combining Neurostimulation Technique With Tailored Interventions for the Affected Upper Extremity), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02915185 nacompletednot on this map

Combining Neurostimulation Technique With Tailored Interventions for the Affected Upper Extremity: Can it Promote Better Recovery in Stroke Survivors?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de SherbrookeRan2017 to 2022Enrolled90ConditionsStrokeArmsstrength training intervention, tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Hélène Milot1Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, École de réadaptation, Université de Sherbrooke, 1036 Belvédère sud, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 4C4 Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4203-2150
Stephania Palimeris2Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Canada.
Hélène Corriveau1Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, École de réadaptation, Université de Sherbrooke, 1036 Belvédère sud, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 4C4 Canada.
François Tremblay5Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Canada.
Marie-Hélène Boudrias2Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Canada.
Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant proportion of individuals are left with poor residual functioning of the affected arm after a stroke. This has a great impact on the quality of life and the ability for stroke survivors to live independently. While strengthening exercises have been recommended to improve arm function, their benefits are generally far from optimal due to the lack of appropriate dosing in terms of intensity. One way to address this problem is to develop better tools that could predict an individual's potential for recovery and then adjust the intensity of exercise accordingly. In this study, we aim at determining whether an individualized strengthening program based on the integrity of the corticospinal tract, as reflected in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in conjunction with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), could lead to more optimal outcomes in terms of arm function in chronic stroke patients.

methodsThis multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial will aim to recruit 84 chronic stroke patients. Before and after training, participants will undergo a clinical evaluation, assessing motor recovery of the affected arm (Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment-FMA) and a TMS evaluation to assess the integrity of the corticospinal tract, as reflected in MEP amplitude. Based on their baseline MEPs amplitude, participants will be stratified into three groups of training intensity levels determined by the one-repetition maximum (1RM); 1) low: 35-50% 1 RM (MEPs < 50 μV); 2) moderate: 50-65% 1RM (MEPs 50-120 μV); and 3) high: 70-80% 1RM (MEPs > 120 μV). Training will target the affected arm (3 times/week for 4 weeks). In addition, participants will be randomly allocated into two tDCS groups (real vs. sham) and tDCS will be applied in an anodal montage during the exercise. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether an individualized strength training intervention in chronic stroke survivors can lead to improved arm function. In addition, we will also determine whether combining anodal tDCS over the lesioned hemisphere with strength training can lead to further improvement in arm function, when compared to sham tDCS.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02915185. Registered September 21 2016.

Indexed as

ExerciseRandomised controlled trialStrokeTranscranial direct current stimulationTranscranial magnetic stimulationUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID31139420
PMCPMC6534822
OpenAlexW2946864773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.