Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139410›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational immunology2019

Clinical chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy: a new and promising treatment modality for glioblastoma.

Michael P Brown, Lisa M Ebert, Tessa Gargett

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Emerging therapies for glioblastoma: current state and future directions.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Immune Cell Landscape in Gastric Cancer.BioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael P BrownTranslational Oncology Laboratory Centre for Cancer Biology University of South Australia and SA Pathology Adelaide SA Australia.
Lisa M EbertTranslational Oncology Laboratory Centre for Cancer Biology University of South Australia and SA Pathology Adelaide SA Australia.
Tessa GargettTranslational Oncology Laboratory Centre for Cancer Biology University of South Australia and SA Pathology Adelaide SA Australia.
Centre for Cancer Biology · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is now approved in the United States and Europe as a standard treatment for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. It has also been approved recently by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia and may soon be publicly reimbursed. This advance has accentuated scientific, clinical and commercial interest in adapting this exciting technology for the treatment of solid cancers where it is widely recognised that the challenges of overcoming a hostile tumor microenvironment are most acute. Indeed, CAR-T cell technology may be of the greatest value for those cancers that lack pre-existing immunity because they are immunologically 'cold', or have a low somatic tumor mutation load, or both. These cancers are generally not amenable to therapeutic immune checkpoint blockade, but CAR-T cell therapy may be effective because it provides an abundant supply of autologous tumor-specific T cells. This is achieved by using genetic engineering to re-direct autologous T-cell cytotoxicity towards a tumor-associated antigen, bypassing endogenous T-cell requirements for antigen processing, MHC-dependent antigen presentation and co-stimulation. One of the most challenging solid cancers is glioblastoma, which has among the least permissive immunological milieu of any cancer, and which is almost always fatal. Here, we argue that CAR-T cell technology may counter some glioblastoma defences and provide a beachhead for furthering our eventual therapeutic aims of restoring effective antitumor immunity. Although clinical investigation of CAR-T cell therapy for glioblastoma is at an early stage, we discuss three recently published studies, which feature significant differences in target antigen, CAR-T cell phenotype, route of administration and tumor response. We discuss the lessons, which may be learned from these studies and which may guide further progress in the field.

Indexed as

chimeric antigen receptorglioblastomaneurotoxicityT cells

Identifiers

PMID31139410
PMCPMC6526894
OpenAlexW2946138597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.