Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139280›Full record

ArticleJournal of atrial fibrillation2018

The Biomarkers NT-proBNP and CA-125 are Elevated in Patients with Idiopathic Atrial Fibrillation.

Elton Amp Dudink, Bob Weijs, Samantha Tull, Justin Glm Luermans, Larissa Fabritz, Winnie Chua, Michiel Rienstra, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Ulrich Schotten, Paulus Kirchhof and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of atrial fibrillation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Different circulating biomarkers in women and men with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the AF-RISK and RACE V studies.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cardiac natriuretic peptides.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elton Amp DudinkMaastricht University Medical Center+ and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Department of Cardiology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Bob WeijsMaastricht University Medical Center+ and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Department of Cardiology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Samantha TullUniversity of Birmingham, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Justin Glm LuermansMaastricht University Medical Center+ and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Department of Cardiology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Larissa FabritzUniversity of Birmingham, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Winnie ChuaUniversity of Birmingham, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Michiel RienstraUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Isabelle C Van GelderUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Ulrich SchottenMaastricht University and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Department of Physiology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Paulus KirchhofUniversity of Birmingham, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Harry Jgm CrijnsMaastricht University Medical Center+ and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Department of Cardiology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/43/30324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood biomarkers related to AF could be useful to detect silent AF and to develop stratified strategies for AF prevention. Previous studies identified markers that predict incident AF. However, it is difficult to differentiate whether biomarkers relate to underlying cardiovascular diseases, are generated by the atria in response to an AF episode, or both. We therefore measured a panel of blood biomarkers in patients without overt CVD with and without AF to investigate the association between biomarkers and atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients without overt cardiovascular disease (CVD).

methodsBlood samples - drawn remote from an AF episode - of 60 patients with AF but without overt forms of CVD (idiopathic AF; iAF) were compared to 120 matched patients with sinus rhythm only. A novel antibody-based method for quantification of blood biomarkers (OlinkProseek Multiplex Cardiovascular) was used to compare 92 biomarkers between the two groups.

resultsN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), Cathepsin L1, Endothelial cell-specific molecule 1, Cancer Antigen-125 (CA-125), Heat shock 27kDa protein, Galanin peptides, Proteinase-activated receptor 1, Stem cell factor, and CD40-ligand were all higher in iAF patients than in SR controls. Both NT-proBNP (OR1.55(1.07-2.25);p=0.022) and CA-125 (OR1.68(1.07-2.64);p=0.026) were independently associated with iAF.

conclusionsThis exploratory study, investigating over 90 cardiovascular blood biomarkers in patients without known CVD, identified one established biomarker for paroxysmal AF, NT-proBNP, and a novel marker, CA-125. CA-125 - previously unrelated to paroxysmal AF in an otherwise healthy population - may thus be a potential indicator of remote paroxysms of AF.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationBiomarkersChronic Coronary Disease

Identifiers

PMID31139280
PMCPMC6533832
OpenAlexW2946004128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.