Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139263›Full record

Observational studyJournal of foot and ankle research2019

Lower limb vascular assessment techniques of podiatrists in the United Kingdom: a national survey.

Peta Ellen Tehan, Martin Fox, Sarah Stewart, Susan Matthews, Vivienne Helaine Chuter

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peta Ellen Tehan1School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW 2258 Australia.
Martin Fox3Manchester Local Care Organisation, National Health Service, Manchester, UK.
Sarah Stewart4Bone and Joint Research Group, Department of Medicine University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Susan Matthews3Manchester Local Care Organisation, National Health Service, Manchester, UK.
Vivienne Helaine Chuter1School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW 2258 Australia.
Auckland University of Technology · NZNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBHunter Water · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPodiatric vascular assessment practices in the United Kingdom (UK) are currently unknown. This study aimed to describe the current practices for performing lower limb vascular assessments by podiatrists in the UK, and, to investigate the effect of practitioner characteristics, including education level and practice setting, on the choice of tests used for these assessments.

methodsA cross-sectional observational online survey of registered podiatrists in the UK was conducted using SurveyMonkey® between 1st of July and 5th of October 2018. Item content related to: practitioner characteristics, vascular testing methods, barriers to completing vascular assessment, interpretation of vascular assessment techniques, education provision and ongoing management and referral pathways. Descriptive statistics were performed, and multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to determine whether practitioner characteristics could predict the choice of vascular tests used.

resultsFive hundred and eighty five participants accessed the online survey. After drop-outs and exclusions, 307 participants were included in the analyses. Comprehensive vascular assessments had most commonly been performed once (15.8%) or twice (10.4%) in the past week. The most common indicators for performing vascular assessment were symptoms of suspected claudication (89.3%), suspected rest pain (86.0%) and history of diabetes (85.3%). The most common barrier to performing vascular assessment was time constraints (52.4%). Doppler examination (72.3%) was the most frequently reported assessment type, with ankle-brachial index (31.9%) and toe brachial index (5.9%) less frequently performed. There were variable interpretations of vascular test results. The most common topic for education was smoking cessation (69.5%). Most participants (72.2%) were confident in determining ongoing management, with the majority referring to the patient's general practitioner (67.6%). Practitioner characteristics did not predict the types of vascular tests performed.

conclusionThe majority of vascular assessments currently performed by podiatrists in the UK are inconsistent with UK or international vascular guidelines and recommendations. Despite this, most podiatrists felt confident in diagnosing, referring and managing patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), however many felt they needed more education to feel confident to assist patients with PAD to manage their cardiovascular risk factors.

Indexed as

Ankle Brachial IndexCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetic AngiopathiesEducational StatusHealth Care SurveysHumansLower ExtremityPatient Education as TopicPeripheral Arterial DiseasePodiatryProfessional PracticeProfessional RoleUltrasonography, DopplerUnited KingdomAnkle-brachial indexDopplerNon-invasive vascular assessmentPodiatristSurveyToe-brachial indexToe systolic pressure

Identifiers

PMID31139263
PMCPMC6530165
OpenAlexW2945051967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.