Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31139050›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2019

Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat.

David Hercher, Markus Kerbl, Christina M A P Schuh, Johannes Heinzel, László Gal, Michaela Stainer, Robert Schmidhammer, Thomas Hausner, Heinz Redl, Antal Nógrádi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

David HercherLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Markus KerblLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Christina M A P SchuhLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes HeinzelLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
László GalDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Michaela StainerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Robert SchmidhammerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas HausnerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Heinz RedlLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Antal NógrádiLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Ara HacobianLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology · ATUniversity of Szeged · HUClínica Alemana · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect model in the rat, where the respective femoral branches distally of the inguinal bifurcation served as homotopic, or heterotopic autografts. Axonal regeneration and target reinnervation was analyzed by gait analysis, electrophysiology, and wet muscle mass analysis. We evaluated regeneration-associated gene expression between 5 days and 10 weeks after repair, in the autografts as well as the proximal, and distal segments of the femoral nerve using qRT-PCR. Furthermore we investigated expression patterns of phenotypically pure ventral and dorsal roots. We identified highly significant differences in gene expression of a variety of regeneration-associated genes along the central - peripheral axis in healthy femoral nerves. Phenotypically mismatched grafting resulted in altered spatiotemporal expression of neurotrophic factor BDNF, GDNF receptor GFRα1, cell adhesion molecules Cadm3, Cadm4, L1CAM, and proliferation associated Ki67. Although significantly higher quadriceps muscle mass following homotopic nerve grafting was measured, we did not observe differences in gait analysis, and electrophysiological parameters between treatment paradigms. Our study provides evidence for phenotypic commitment of autologous nerve grafts after injury and gives a conclusive overview of temporal expression of several important regeneration-associated genes after repair with sensory or motor graft.

Indexed as

cell adhesion moleculefemoral nervegene expressionneurotrophic factorperipheral nerve regenerationphenotypeSchwann cell

Identifiers

PMID31139050
PMCPMC6519304
OpenAlexW2944743928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.