Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138910›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2019

Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction.

Elizabeth Redcay, Leonhard Schilbach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 330 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
330citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

330 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Promoting Social Connectedness Through Interbrain Neurofeedback.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intentional sadness contagion: Social bonding with neural decoupling.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

270 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth RedcayDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. redcay@umd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1568-3102
Leonhard SchilbachClinic and Day Clinic for Disorders of Social Interaction & Independent Max-Planck Research Group for Social Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-8309

Funding

Project IV: Investigating the Mirror Neuron System in austism spectrum disorderP01HD064653 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FOX, NATHAN A · 2010 to 2020
$11.9M
Dynamics of Large-Scale Networks During Emotional and Social ProcessingR01MH112517 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PESSOA, LUIZ, REDCAY, ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Brain Network Dynamics Contributing to Atypical Social Interaction in AutismR01MH107441 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI REDCAY, ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD064653NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107441NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a large proportion of our lives are spent participating in social interactions, the investigation of the neural mechanisms supporting these interactions has largely been restricted to situations of social observation - that is, situations in which an individual observes a social stimulus without opportunity for interaction. In recent years, efforts have been made to develop a truly social, or 'second-person', neuroscientific approach to these investigations in which neural processes are examined within the context of a real-time reciprocal social interaction. These developments have helped to elucidate the behavioural and neural mechanisms of social interactions; however, further theoretical and methodological innovations are still needed. Findings to date suggest that the neural mechanisms supporting social interaction differ from those involved in social observation and highlight a role of the so-called 'mentalizing network' as important in this distinction. Taking social interaction seriously may also be particularly important for the advancement of the neuroscientific study of different psychiatric conditions.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsBrainHumansMentalizationNeural PathwaysNeurosciences

Identifiers

PMID31138910
PMCPMC6997943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.