Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138896›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2019

Night shift work and risk of breast cancer in women: the Generations Study cohort.

Michael E Jones, Minouk J Schoemaker, Emily C McFadden, Lauren B Wright, Louise E Johns, Anthony J Swerdlow

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05159141 (The Role of Circadian Rhythm in the Effect of Sleep Intervention on Obesity Prevention in Early Childhood), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05159141 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Circadian Rhythm in the Effect of Sleep Intervention on Obesity Prevention in Early Childhood

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRan2022 to 2024Enrolled480ConditionsInfant Sleep ProblemArmsBehavioral sleep intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael E JonesDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK. Michael.Jones@icr.ac.uk.
Minouk J SchoemakerDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Emily C McFaddenDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Lauren B WrightDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Louise E JohnsDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Anthony J SwerdlowDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is plausible that night shift work could affect breast cancer risk, possibly by melatonin suppression or circadian clock disruption, but epidemiological evidence is inconclusive.

methodsUsing serial questionnaires from the Generations Study cohort, we estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for breast cancer in relation to being a night shift worker within the last 10 years, adjusted for potential confounders.

resultsAmong 102,869 women recruited in 2003-2014, median follow-up 9.5 years, 2059 developed invasive breast cancer. The HR in relation to night shift work was 1.00 (95%CI: 0.86-1.15). There was a significant trend with average hours of night work per week (P = 0.035), but no significantly raised risks for hours worked per night, nights worked per week, average hours worked per week, cumulative years of employment, cumulative hours, time since cessation, type of occupation, age starting night shift work, or age starting in relation to first pregnancy.

conclusionsThe lack of overall association, and no association with all but one measure of dose, duration, and intensity in our data, does not support an increased risk of breast cancer from night shift work in women.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsShift Work ScheduleERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID31138896
PMCPMC6738051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.