Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138855›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A structural and biochemical comparison of Ribonuclease E homologues from pathogenic bacteria highlights species-specific properties.

Charlotte E Mardle, Thomas J Shakespeare, Louise E Butt, Layla R Goddard, Darren M Gowers, Helen S Atkins, Helen A Vincent, Anastasia J Callaghan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeting of the EssentialBiomedicines · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Proteomic Analyses ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte E MardleSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom.
Thomas J ShakespeareSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom.
Louise E ButtSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom.
Layla R GoddardSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom.
Darren M GowersSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom.
Helen S AtkinsDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Helen A VincentSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom. Helen.Vincent@port.ac.uk.
Anastasia J CallaghanSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom. Anastasia.Callaghan@port.ac.uk.
University of Portsmouth · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation of gene expression through processing and turnover of RNA is a key mechanism that allows bacteria to rapidly adapt to changing environmental conditions. Consequently, RNA degrading enzymes (ribonucleases; RNases) such as the endoribonuclease RNase E, frequently play critical roles in pathogenic bacterial virulence and are potential antibacterial targets. RNase E consists of a highly conserved catalytic domain and a variable non-catalytic domain that functions as the structural scaffold for the multienzyme degradosome complex. Despite conservation of the catalytic domain, a recent study identified differences in the response of RNase E homologues from different species to the same inhibitory compound(s). While RNase E from Escherichia coli has been well-characterised, far less is known about RNase E homologues from other bacterial species. In this study, we structurally and biochemically characterise the RNase E catalytic domains from four pathogenic bacteria: Yersinia pestis, Francisella tularensis, Burkholderia pseudomallei and Acinetobacter baumannii, with a view to exploiting RNase E as an antibacterial target. Bioinformatics, small-angle x-ray scattering and biochemical RNA cleavage assays reveal globally similar structural and catalytic properties. Surprisingly, subtle species-specific differences in both structure and substrate specificity were also identified that may be important for the development of effective antibacterial drugs targeting RNase E.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBurkholderia pseudomalleiCatalytic DomainCloning, MolecularEndoribonucleasesEscherichia coliFrancisella tularensisGene ExpressionGenetic VectorsKineticsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Conformation, beta-StrandBacterial ProteinsEndoribonucleasesRecombinant Proteinsribonuclease ERNA

Identifiers

PMID31138855
PMCPMC6538622
OpenAlexW2947096544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.