Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138689›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Motor primitives are determined in early development and are then robustly conserved into adulthood.

Qi Yang, David Logan, Simon F Giszter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qi YangDepartment of Neurology & Orthopedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032.
David LoganNeurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129.
Simon F GiszterNeurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129; sgiszter@drexelmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4951-7644

Funding

Crucial spinal circuit changes that mediate locomotor benefits and deficits following combined therapies after spinal cord injuryR01NS104194 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI Kimberly J Dougherty, SIMON F GISZTER · 2018 to 2026
$4.2M
Multielectrode recording in spinal cord during locomotion and rehabilitation afteR01NS072651 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI GISZTER, SIMON F · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Neurorobotics, modularity and function in SCI and Normal RatsR01NS054894 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI GISZTER, SIMON F · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054894NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072651NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor patterns in legged vertebrates show modularity in both young and adult animals, comprising motor synergies or primitives. Are such spinal modules observed in young mammals conserved into adulthood or altered? Conceivably, early circuit modules alter radically through experience and descending pathways' activity. We analyze lumbar motor patterns of intact adult rats and the same rats after spinal transection and compare these with adult rats spinal transected 5 days postnatally, before most motor experience, using only rats that never developed hind limb weight bearing. We use independent component analysis (ICA) to extract synergies from electromyography (EMG). ICA information-based methods identify both weakly active and strongly active synergies. We compare all spatial synergies and their activation/drive strengths as proxies of spinal modules and their underlying circuits. Remarkably, we find that spatial primitives/synergies of adult injured and neonatal injured rats differed insignificantly, despite different developmental histories. However, intact rats possess some synergies that differ significantly, although modestly, in spatial structure. Rats injured as adults were more similar in modularity to rats that had neonatal spinal transection than to themselves before injury. We surmise that spinal circuit modules for spatial synergy patterns may be determined early, before postnatal day 5 (P5), and remain largely unaltered by subsequent development or weight-bearing experience. An alternative explanation but equally important is that, after complete spinal transection, both neonatal and mature adult spinal cords rapidly converge to common synergy sets. This fundamental or convergent synergy circuitry, fully determined by P5, is revealed after spinal cord transection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornEfferent PathwaysElectromyographyFemaleHindlimbMuscle, SkeletalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesWeight-Bearingdevelopmentmotor primitivesmuscle synergiespattern generationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID31138689
PMCPMC6575561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.