ArticleGenome research2019
Crunch: integrated processing and modeling of ChIP-seq data in terms of regulatory motifs.
Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Physiological Regulation of Transposable Elements In Vivo: Nuclei Preparation from Primary Mouse Tissues for Epigenomic Analyses and Computational Approaches to Interrogate the Repeat Genome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Beyond the Microscope: Integrating Liquid Biopsies into the Molecular Pathology Era of Endometrial Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- In silico screening system based on a transcription factors regulatory network only using transcriptomic data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Improved analysis of (e)CLIP data with RCRUNCH yields a compendium of RNA-binding protein binding sites and motifs.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Recent Bioinformatic Progress to Identify Epigenetic Changes Associated to Transposable Elements.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Dedifferentiation and neuronal repression define familial Alzheimer's disease.Science advances · 2020Article
- The methylation status of the chemerin promoter region located from - 252 to + 258 bp regulates constitutive but not acute-phase cytokine-inducible chemerin expression levels.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Mobile genomics: tools and techniques for tackling transposons.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although ChIP-seq has become a routine experimental approach for quantitatively characterizing the genome-wide binding of transcription factors (TFs), computational analysis procedures remain far from standardized, making it difficult to compare ChIP-seq results across experiments. In addition, although genome-wide binding patterns must ultimately be determined by local constellations of DNA-binding sites, current analysis is typically limited to identifying enriched motifs in ChIP-seq peaks. Here we present Crunch, a completely automated computational method that performs all ChIP-seq analysis from quality control through read mapping and peak detecting and that integrates comprehensive modeling of the ChIP signal in terms of known and novel binding motifs, quantifying the contribution of each motif and annotating which combinations of motifs explain each binding peak. By applying Crunch to 128 data sets from the ENCODE Project, we show that Crunch outperforms current peak finders and find that TFs naturally separate into "solitary TFs," for which a single motif explains the ChIP-peaks, and "cobinding TFs," for which multiple motifs co-occur within peaks. Moreover, for most data sets, the motifs that Crunch identified de novo outperform known motifs, and both the set of cobinding motifs and the top motif of solitary TFs are consistent across experiments and cell lines. Crunch is implemented as a web server, enabling standardized analysis of any collection of ChIP-seq data sets by simply uploading raw sequencing data. Results are provided both in a graphical web interface and as downloadable files.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.