Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138617›Full record

ArticleGenome research2019

Crunch: integrated processing and modeling of ChIP-seq data in terms of regulatory motifs.

Severin Berger, Mikhail Pachkov, Phil Arnold, Saeed Omidi, Nicholas Kelley, Silvia Salatino, Erik van Nimwegen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mobile genomics: tools and techniques for tackling transposons.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Severin BergerBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Mikhail PachkovBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Phil ArnoldBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Saeed OmidiBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Nicholas KelleyBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Silvia SalatinoBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Erik van NimwegenBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although ChIP-seq has become a routine experimental approach for quantitatively characterizing the genome-wide binding of transcription factors (TFs), computational analysis procedures remain far from standardized, making it difficult to compare ChIP-seq results across experiments. In addition, although genome-wide binding patterns must ultimately be determined by local constellations of DNA-binding sites, current analysis is typically limited to identifying enriched motifs in ChIP-seq peaks. Here we present Crunch, a completely automated computational method that performs all ChIP-seq analysis from quality control through read mapping and peak detecting and that integrates comprehensive modeling of the ChIP signal in terms of known and novel binding motifs, quantifying the contribution of each motif and annotating which combinations of motifs explain each binding peak. By applying Crunch to 128 data sets from the ENCODE Project, we show that Crunch outperforms current peak finders and find that TFs naturally separate into "solitary TFs," for which a single motif explains the ChIP-peaks, and "cobinding TFs," for which multiple motifs co-occur within peaks. Moreover, for most data sets, the motifs that Crunch identified de novo outperform known motifs, and both the set of cobinding motifs and the top motif of solitary TFs are consistent across experiments and cell lines. Crunch is implemented as a web server, enabling standardized analysis of any collection of ChIP-seq data sets by simply uploading raw sequencing data. Results are provided both in a graphical web interface and as downloadable files.

Indexed as

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingAmino Acid MotifsAnimalsBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicHumansNucleotide MotifsQuality ControlRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31138617
PMCPMC6633267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.