ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2019
Prescription Patterns of Sedative Hypnotic Medications in the Military Health System.
Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in US military personnel with insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, or comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024Article
- Clonidine is better than zopiclone for insomnia treatment in chronic pain patients.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesTo evaluate prevalence of sedative hypnotic medications and their potential indication among active duty service members (ADSM) and non-ADSM receiving care in the Military Health System (MHS).
methodsUsing a retrospective cohort study design, we extracted data on sedative hypnotic medications (benzodiazepine receptor agonists, benzodiazepines, sedating antidepressants, and melatonin receptor agonist) dispensed from January 2009 to December 2015. Prevalence was defined as ≥ 1 dispensing per patient per year whereas chronic episode was categorized as ≥ 90 days of continuous therapy. Chi square statistics, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess meaningful differences between ADSM and non-ADSM.
resultsMean age at dispensing was 33.5 years in ADSM compared to 59.1 years in non-ADSM. Of all drugs dispensed, 79.2% (n = 2.4 million) were to male ADSM compared to 34.5% (11.5 million) to male non-ADSM. Zolpidem and trazodone were the two most frequently used medications, comprising more than 75% of all prescriptions. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence peaked at 8.1% in 2013 for ADSM and at 4.9% in 2012 for non-ADSM and remained stable thereafter for both groups. Most episodes for ADSM (81.0%) and non-ADSM (65.0%) were acute or intermittent. ADSM were significantly more likely to have a sleep-related diagnosis associated with their episode than non-ADSM (odds ratio 2.35, 95% confidence interval 2.33-2.36), most frequently insomnia.
conclusionsADSM had a 2% to 3% higher adjusted prevalence of sedative hypnotic medications than non-ADSM. The use of sedative hypnotics in the young ADSM population highlights the need for military-appropriate sleep practices and novel interventions to mitigate sleep disturbances and chronic sleep disorders in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.