Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138290›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

3D vs. 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial.

Roger Wahba, Rabi Raj Datta, Andrea Hedergott, Jana Bußhoff, Thomas Bruns, Robert Kleinert, Georg Dieplinger, Hans Fuchs, Caroline Gietzelt, Desdemona Möller and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03445429 (3D- vs. 4K-display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique on Surgical Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03445429 nacompletednot on this map

3D- vs. 4K-display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique on Surgical Performance

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum KölnRan2018 to 2020Enrolled133ConditionsSurgical PerformanceArms3D-display system, 4K-display system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Roger WahbaDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. roger.wahba@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0037-8620
Rabi Raj DattaDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Andrea HedergottDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jana BußhoffDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Robert KleinertDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Georg DieplingerDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Hans FuchsDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Caroline GietzeltDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Desdemona MöllerFaculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin HellmichInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane J BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Dirk L StippelDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-dimensional (3D) stereoscopic vision is crucial to perform any kind of manual task. The reduction from real life 3D to virtual two-dimensional (2D) sight is a major challenge in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). A 3D display technique has been shown to reduce operation time and mistakes and to improve the learning curve. Therefore, the use of a3D display technique seems to optimize surgical performance for novice and experienced surgeons. Inspired by consumer electronics, a 4K display technique was recently introduced to MIS. Due to its high resolution and zoom effect, surgeons should benefit from it. The aim of this study is to evaluate if "state-of-the-art" 3D- vs. 4K-display techniques could influence surgical performance.

methodsA randomized, cross-over, single-institution, single-blinded trial is designed. It compares the primary outcome parameter "surgical performance", represented by "performance time "and "number of mistakes", using a passive polarizing 3D and a 4K display system (two arms) to perform different tasks in a minimally invasive/laparoscopic training parkour. Secondary outcome parameters are the mental stress load (National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task Load Index) and the learning curve. Unexperienced novices (medical students), non-board-certified, and board-certified abdominal surgeons participate in the trial (i.e., level of experience, 3 strata). The parkour consists of seven tasks (for novices, five tasks), which will be repeated three times. The 1st run of the parkour will be performed with the randomized display system, the 2nd run with the other one. After each run, the mental stress load is measured. After completion of the parkour, all participants are evaluated by an ophthalmologist for visual acuity and stereoscopic vision with five tests. Assuming a correlation of 0.5 between measurements per subject, a sample size of 36 per stratum is required to detect a standardized effect of 0.5 (including an additional 5% for a non-parametric approach) with a power of 80% at a two-sided type I error of 5%. Thus, altogether 108 subjects need to be enrolled. DISCUSSION: Complex surgical procedures are performed in a minimally invasive/laparoscopic technique. This study should provide some evidence to decide which display technique a surgeon could choose to optimize his performance.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03445429 . Registered on 7 February 2018.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSimulation TrainingCross-Over StudiesHumansLaparoscopyLearning CurveMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch Design3D4KLaparoscopicLearning curveMinimally invasive surgerySurgical performanceSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID31138290
PMCPMC6540550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.