Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138263›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2019

Increased diagnostic yield by reanalysis of data from a hearing loss gene panel.

Yu Sun, Jiale Xiang, Yidong Liu, Sen Chen, Jintao Yu, Jiguang Peng, Zijing Liu, Lisha Chen, Jun Sun, Yun Yang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of the NHS R67 Monogenic Hearing Loss Panel in a Single UK Centre.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Mechanisms of enhanced noise susceptibility in waardenburg syndromeLin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel compound heterozygous variants in thePediatric investigation · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Genetics of pediatric hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu SunDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Jiale XiangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Yidong LiuBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Sen ChenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Jintao YuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Jiguang PengBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Zijing LiuBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Lisha ChenBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Jun SunTianjin Medical Laboratory, BGI-Tianjin, BGI-Shenzhen, Tianjin, 300308, China.
Yun YangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Yaping YangDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Yulin ZhouUnited Diagnostic and Research Center for Clinical Genetics, School of Public Health of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, 361003, China. zhou_yulin@126.com.
Zhiyu PengBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China. pengzhiyu@bgi.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2349-750X
BGI Group (China) · CNUnion Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University · CNXiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital hearing loss affects approximately 1-2 infants out of every 1000, with 50% of the cases resulting from genetic factors. Targeted gene panels have been widely used for genetic diagnosis of hearing loss. This study aims to reveal new diagnoses via reanalyzing historical data of a multigene panel, and exam the reasons for new diagnoses.

methodsA total of 210 samples were enlisted, including clinical reports and sequencing data of patients with congenital/prelingual hearing loss who were referred to clinical genetic testing from October 2014 to June 2017. All variants listed on the original clinical reports were reinterpreted according to the standards and guidelines recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP). Expanded analysis of raw data were performed in undiagnosed cases.

resultsRe-analysis resulted in nine new diagnoses, improving the overall diagnostic rate from 39 to 43%. New diagnoses were attributed to newly published clinical evidence in the literature, adoption of new interpretation guidelines and expanded analysis range.

conclusionThis work demonstrates benefits of reanalysis of targeted gene panel data, indicating that periodical reanalysis should be performed in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesFemaleGenetic VariationHearing LossHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic yieldHearing lossMultigene panelReanalysisVariant interpretation

Identifiers

PMID31138263
PMCPMC6540452
OpenAlexW2947566687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.