Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138247›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2019

Albumin infusion rate and plasma volume expansion: a randomized clinical trial in postoperative patients after major surgery.

Svajunas Statkevicius, Johan Bonnevier, Jane Fisher, Björn P Bark, Erik Larsson, Carl M Öberg, Päivi Kannisto, Bobby Tingstedt, Peter Bentzer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects ofResuscitation plus · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Where does the fluid go?Annals of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Svajunas StatkeviciusDepartment of Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Johan BonnevierDepartment of Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Jane FisherDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Björn P BarkDepartment of Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Erik LarssonDepartment of Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Carl M ÖbergDepartment of Nephrology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Päivi KannistoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Bobby TingstedtDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Peter BentzerDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg and Lund University, 251 87, Helsingborg, Sweden. peter.bentzer@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-3886

Funding

ALF 18401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal infusion rate of colloids in patients with suspected hypovolemia is unknown, and the primary objective of the present study was to test if plasma volume expansion by 5% albumin is greater if fluid is administered slowly rather than rapidly.

methodsPatients with signs of hypoperfusion after major abdominal surgery were randomized to intravenous infusion of 5% albumin at a dose of 10 ml/kg (ideal body weight) either rapidly (30 min) or slowly (180 min). Plasma volume was measured using radiolabeled albumin at baseline, at 30 min, and at 180 min after the start of infusion. Primary outcome was change in plasma volume from the start of infusion to 180 min after the start of infusion. Secondary outcomes included the change in the area under the plasma volume curve and transcapillary escape rate (TER) for albumin from 180 to 240 min after the start of albumin infusion.

resultsA total of 33 and 31 patients were included in the analysis in the slow and rapid groups, respectively. The change in plasma volume from the start of infusion to 180 min did not differ between the slow and rapid infusion groups (7.4 ± 2.6 vs. 6.5 ± 4.1 ml/kg; absolute difference, 0.9 ml/kg [95%CI, - 0.8 to 2.6], P = 0.301). Change in the area under the plasma volume curve was smaller in the slow than in the rapid infusion group and was 866 ± 341 and 1226 ± 419 min ml/kg, respectively, P < 0.001. TER for albumin did not differ and was 5.3 ± 3.1%/h and 5.4 ± 3%/h in the slow and in the rapid infusion groups, respectively, P = 0.931.

conclusionsThis study does not support our hypothesis that a slow infusion of colloid results in a greater plasma volume expansion than a rapid infusion. Instead, our result of a smaller change in the area under the plasma volume curve indicates that a slow infusion results in a less efficient plasma volume expansion, but further studies are required to confirm this finding. A rapid infusion has no effect on vascular leak as measured after completion of the infusion.

trial registrationEudraCT2013-004446-42 registered December 23, 2014.

Indexed as

AgedAlbuminsAnalysis of VarianceDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPlasma SubstitutesPlasma VolumePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricSwedenAlbuminsPlasma SubstitutesFluid therapyPlasma volume expandersSerum albumin

Identifiers

PMID31138247
PMCPMC6537197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.