Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138174›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Community-based self-collected human papillomavirus screening in rural Zimbabwe.

Megan B Fitzpatrick, Ziad El-Khatib, David Katzenstein, Benjamin A Pinsky, Zvavahera Mike Chirenje, Kathy McCarty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan B FitzpatrickDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. megan6@stanford.edu.
Ziad El-KhatibDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Instiutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
David KatzensteinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Benjamin A PinskyDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Zvavahera Mike ChirenjeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Zimbabwe, 630 Churchill Avenue, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kathy McCartyChidamoyo Christian Hospital, P.O. Box 330, Karoi, Zimbabwe.

Funding

Research Mentoring and Building Capacity of underrepresented Minority Research Scientists in India.D43TW010540 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHELE BARRY, Eva Harris · 2017 to 2026
$15.5M
Global Health Fellows and Scholars Research TrainingR25TW009338 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BARRY, MICHELE, KO, ALBERT ICKSANG · 2012 to 2016
$5.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010540FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), women have limited access to and uptake of cervical cancer screening. Delayed diagnosis leads to poorer outcomes and early mortality, and continues to impede cancer control disproportionately in LMIC. Integrating self-collected, community-based screening for High Risk-Human Papilloma Virus (HR-HPV) into existent HIV programs is a potential screening method to identify women at high risk for developing high-risk cervical lesions.

methodsWe implemented community-based cross-sectional study on self-collection HR-HPV screening in conjunction with existing community outreach models for the distribution of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and the World Health Organization Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) outreach in villages in rural Zimbabwe from January 2017 through May 2017.

resultsOverall, there was an 82% response rate: 70% of respondents participated in self-collection and 12% were ineligible for the study (inclusion criteria: age 30-65, not pregnant, with an intact uterus). Women recruited in the first 2-3 months of the study had more opportunities to participate and therefore significantly higher participation: 81% participation (additional 11% ineligible), while those with fewer opportunities also had lower participation: 63% (additional 13% ineligible) (p < 0.001). Some village outreach centers (N = 5/12) had greater than 89% participation.

conclusionsIntegration of HR-HPV screening into existing community outreach models for HIV and immunizations could facilitate population-based screening to scale cancer control and prevention programs in sub-Saharan Africa. Community/village health workers (CHW/VHW) and village outreach programs offer a potential option for cervical cancer screening programs to move towards improving access of sexual and reproductive health resources for women at highest risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Self EvaluationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePovertyRural PopulationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsZimbabweCancer screeningCervical cancer screeningHuman papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID31138174
PMCPMC6538544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.