Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138128›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

flowDiv: a new pipeline for analyzing flow cytometric diversity.

Bruno M S Wanderley, Daniel S A Araújo, María V Quiroga, André M Amado, Adrião D D Neto, Hugo Sarmento, Sebastián D Metz, Fernando Unrein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bruno M S WanderleyInstituto Metrópole Digital, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-6990
Daniel S A AraújoInstituto Metrópole Digital, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
María V QuirogaInstituto Tecnológico de Chascomús (INTECH), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
André M AmadoDepartamento de Oceanografia e Limnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Adrião D D NetoInstituto Metrópole Digital, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Hugo SarmentoDepartamento de Hidrobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Sebastián D MetzInstituto Tecnológico de Chascomús (INTECH), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernando UnreinInstituto Tecnológico de Chascomús (INTECH), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. funrein@intech.gov.ar.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/14139-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/50494-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlow cytometry (FCM) is one of the most commonly used technologies for analysis of numerous biological systems at the cellular level, from cancer cells to microbial communities. Its high potential and wide applicability led to the development of various analytical protocols, which are often not interchangeable between fields of expertise. Environmental science in particular faces difficulty in adapting to non-specific protocols, mainly because of the highly heterogeneous nature of environmental samples. This variety, although it is intrinsic to environmental studies, makes it difficult to adjust analytical protocols to maintain both mathematical formalism and comprehensible biological interpretations, principally for questions that rely on the evaluation of differences between cytograms, an approach also termed cytometric diversity. Despite the availability of promising bioinformatic tools conceived for or adapted to cytometric diversity, most of them still cannot deal with common technical issues such as the integration of differently acquired datasets, the optimal number of bins, and the effective correlation of bins to previously known cytometric populations.

resultsTo address these and other questions, we have developed flowDiv, an R language pipeline for analysis of environmental flow cytometry data. Here, we present the rationale for flowDiv and apply the method to a real dataset from 31 freshwater lakes in Patagonia, Argentina, to reveal significant aspects of their cytometric diversities.

conclusionsflowDiv provides a rather intuitive way of proceeding with FCM analysis, as it combines formal mathematical solutions and biological rationales in an intuitive framework specifically designed to explore cytometric diversity.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoftwareFlow CytometryHumansLakesMicrobiotaPrincipal Component AnalysisStatistics, NonparametricCytometric diversityFlow cytometryR language

Identifiers

PMID31138128
PMCPMC6540361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.