Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138122›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

mRNA profiling reveals significant transcriptional differences between a multipotent progenitor and its differentiated sister.

Laura D Mathies, Surjyendu Ray, Kayla Lopez-Alvillar, Michelle N Arbeitman, Andrew G Davies, Jill C Bettinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hand Dissection of Caenorhabditis elegans Intestines.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura D MathiesDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980613, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA. ldmathies@vcu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2749-6531
Surjyendu RayDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Kayla Lopez-AlvillarDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980613, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Michelle N ArbeitmanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Andrew G DaviesDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980613, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Jill C BettingerDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980613, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.

Funding

Genes Underlying Reproductive Behavior and PhysiologyR01GM073039 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARBEITMAN, MICHELLE N · 2006 to 2020
$4.4M
VCU Bridges to the Baccalaureate: From Dream to GoalR25GM102795 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI CHU, SHIJIAN, GOLDING, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2013 to 2022
$2.6M
Chromatin and BehaviorR01GM116998 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ARBEITMAN, MICHELLE N · 2017 to 2020
$1.0M
National Science Foundation IOS-1557891NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073039NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116998NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM102795NIH HHS R25GM102795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe two Caenorhabditis elegans somatic gonadal precursors (SGPs) are multipotent progenitors that generate all somatic tissues of the adult reproductive system. The sister cells of the SGPs are two head mesodermal cells (hmcs); one hmc dies by programmed cell death and the other terminally differentiates. Thus, a single cell division gives rise to one multipotent progenitor and one differentiated cell with identical lineage histories. We compared the transcriptomes of SGPs and hmcs in order to learn the determinants of multipotency and differentiation in this lineage.

resultsWe generated a strain that expressed fluorescent markers specifically in SGPs (ehn-3A::tdTomato) and hmcs (bgal-1::GFP). We dissociated cells from animals after the SGP/hmc cell division, but before the SGPs had further divided, and subjected the dissociated cells to fluorescence-activated cell sorting to collect isolated SGPs and hmcs. We analyzed the transcriptomes of these cells and found that 5912 transcripts were significantly differentially expressed, with at least two-fold change in expression, between the two cell types. The hmc-biased genes were enriched with those that are characteristic of neurons. The SGP-biased genes were enriched with those indicative of cell proliferation and development. We assessed the validity of our differentially expressed genes by examining existing reporters for five of the 10 genes with the most significantly biased expression in SGPs and found that two showed expression in SGPs. For one reporter that did not show expression in SGPs, we generated a GFP knock-in using CRISPR/Cas9. This reporter, in the native genomic context, was expressed in SGPs.

conclusionsWe found that the transcriptional profiles of SGPs and hmcs are strikingly different. The hmc-biased genes are enriched with those that encode synaptic transmission machinery, which strongly suggests that it has neuron-like signaling properties. In contrast, the SGP-biased genes are enriched with genes that encode factors involved in transcription and translation, as would be expected from a cell preparing to undergo proliferative divisions. Mediators of multipotency are likely to be among the genes differentially expressed in SGPs.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCell DifferentiationGene Expression ProfilingGonadsMesodermMultipotent Stem CellsRNA, MessengerRNA, MessengerC. elegansDifferential gene expressionhmcMultipotent progenitorSGPTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31138122
PMCPMC6540470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.