Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138120›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Efficient estimation of grouped survival models.

Zhiguo Li, Jiaxing Lin, Alexander B Sibley, Tracy Truong, Katherina C Chua, Yu Jiang, Janice McCarthy, Deanna L Kroetz, Andrew Allen, Kouros Owzar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhiguo LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA. zhiguo.li@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9975-6005
Jiaxing LinDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Alexander B SibleyDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Tracy TruongDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Katherina C ChuaDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Yu JiangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Janice McCarthyDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Deanna L KroetzDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Andrew AllenDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Kouros OwzarDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA.

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NCI NIH HHS P01CA142538NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTime- and dose-to-event phenotypes used in basic science and translational studies are commonly measured imprecisely or incompletely due to limitations of the experimental design or data collection schema. For example, drug-induced toxicities are not reported by the actual time or dose triggering the event, but rather are inferred from the cycle or dose to which the event is attributed. This exemplifies a prevalent type of imprecise measurement called grouped failure time, where times or doses are restricted to discrete increments. Failure to appropriately account for the grouped nature of the data, when present, may lead to biased analyses.

resultsWe present groupedSurv, an R package which implements a statistically rigorous and computationally efficient approach for conducting genome-wide analyses based on grouped failure time phenotypes. Our approach accommodates adjustments for baseline covariates, and analysis at the variant or gene level. We illustrate the statistical properties of the approach and computational performance of the package by simulation. We present the results of a reanalysis of a published genome-wide study to identify common germline variants associated with the risk of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients.

conclusionsgroupedSurv enables fast and rigorous genome-wide analysis on the basis of grouped failure time phenotypes at the variant, gene or pathway level. The package is freely available under a public license through the Comprehensive R Archive Network.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticBenchmarkingGene FrequencyHumansLikelihood FunctionsPhenotypeSoftwareStatistics as TopicDiscrete censoringEfficient scoreGenome-wide analysisGrouped dataHeritabilityMultiple testingPharmacogenomicsScore statistic

Identifiers

PMID31138120
PMCPMC6540566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.