Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31138075›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Bee pathogen transmission dynamics: deposition, persistence and acquisition on flowers.

Laura L Figueroa, Malcolm Blinder, Cali Grincavitch, Angus Jelinek, Emilia K Mann, Liam A Merva, Lucy E Metz, Amy Y Zhao, Rebecca E Irwin, Scott H McArt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Virus distributions in wild bees are associated with floral communities at local to landscape scales.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura L Figueroa1 Department of Entomology, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY 14853 , USA.
Malcolm Blinder2 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, MA 01003 , USA.
Cali Grincavitch2 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, MA 01003 , USA.
Angus Jelinek2 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, MA 01003 , USA.
Emilia K Mann2 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, MA 01003 , USA.
Liam A Merva2 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, MA 01003 , USA.
Lucy E Metz2 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, MA 01003 , USA.
Amy Y Zhao2 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, MA 01003 , USA.
Rebecca E Irwin3 Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University , 127 David Clark Laboratories, Raleigh, NC 27695 , USA.
Scott H McArt1 Department of Entomology, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY 14853 , USA.
Lynn S Adler2 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, MA 01003 , USA.

Funding

Transmission Networks in Trait-Based CommunitiesR01GM122062 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ADLER, LYNN S., ELLNER, STEPHEN PAUL · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases are a primary driver of bee decline worldwide, but limited understanding of how pathogens are transmitted hampers effective management. Flowers have been implicated as hubs of bee disease transmission, but we know little about how interspecific floral variation affects transmission dynamics. Using bumblebees ( Bombus impatiens), a trypanosomatid pathogen ( Crithidia bombi) and three plant species varying in floral morphology, we assessed how host infection and plant species affect pathogen deposition on flowers, and plant species and flower parts impact pathogen survival and acquisition at flowers. We found that host infection with Crithidia increased defaecation rates on flowers, and that bees deposited faeces onto bracts of Lobelia siphilitica and Lythrum salicaria more frequently than onto Monarda didyma bracts . Among flower parts, bracts were associated with the lowest pathogen survival but highest resulting infection intensity in bee hosts. Additionally, we found that Crithidia survival across flower parts was reduced with sun exposure. These results suggest that efficiency of pathogen transmission depends on where deposition occurs and the timing and place of acquisition, which varies among plant species and environmental conditions. This information could be used for development of wildflower mixes that maximize forage while minimizing disease spread.

Indexed as

FlowersHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsBeesCrithidiaLobeliaLythrumMonardaBombus impatiensCrithidia bombidisease spreadfloral morphologypollinator health

Identifiers

PMID31138075
PMCPMC6545085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.