ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019
Functional amyloids promote retention of public goods in bacteria.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- How social is social resistance?Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- SOCfinder: a genomic tool for identifying social genes in bacteria.Microbial genomics · 2023Article
- How public can public goods be? Environmental context shapes the evolutionary ecology of partially private goods.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Complex extracellular biology drives surface competition during colony expansion in Bacillus subtilis.The ISME journal · 2022Article
- Ten recent insights for our understanding of cooperation.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021Review
- Bacterial siderophores in community and host interactions.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2020Review
- Computational Assessment of Bacterial Protein Structures Indicates a Selection Against Aggregation.Cells · 2019Article
- Functional amyloids promote retention of public goods in bacteria.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growth and virulence of bacteria depends upon a number of factors that are secreted into the environment. These factors can diffuse away from the producing cells, to be either lost or used by cells that do not produce them (cheats). Mechanisms that act to reduce the loss of secreted factors through diffusion are expected to be favoured. One such mechanism may be the production of Fap fibrils, needle-like fibres on the cell surface observed in P. aeruginosa, which can transiently bind several secreted metabolites produced by cells. We test whether Fap fibrils help retain a secreted factor, the iron-scavenging molecule pyoverdine, and hence reduce the potential for exploitation by non-producing, cheating cells. We found that: (i) wild-type cells retain more iron-chelating metabolites than fibril non-producers; (ii) purified Fap fibrils can prevent the loss of the iron-chelators PQS ( Pseudomonas quinolone signal) and pyoverdine; and (iii) pyoverdine non-producers have higher fitness in competition with fibril non-producers than with wild-type cells. Our results suggest that by limiting the loss of a costly public good, Fap fibrils may play an important role in stabilizing cooperative production of secreted factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.