Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31137987›Full record

ArticleJournal of child neurology2019

Neurodevelopmental Risk: A Tool to Enhance Conversations With Families of Infants.

Monica E Lemmon, Hanna E Huffstetler, Pamela Donohue, Madelaine Katz, Mary C Barks, Emma Schindler, Debra Brandon, Renee D Boss, Peter A Ubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A question prompt list for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A valued voice: A qualitative analysis of parental decision-making preferences in emergent paediatric surgery.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monica E Lemmon1 Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Hanna E Huffstetler3 Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, DC, USA.
Pamela Donohue4 Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Madelaine Katz3 Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, DC, USA.
Mary C Barks3 Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3060-5524
Emma Schindler3 Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, DC, USA.
Debra Brandon1 Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Renee D Boss4 Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter A Ubel8 Fuqua School of Business, Sanford School of Public Policy, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Child Neurologist Career Development Program (CNCDP)K12NS098482 · NINDS · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI SCHLAGGAR, BRADLEY L · 2016 to 2025
$26.2M
NINDS NIH HHS K12 NS098482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parents of infants at risk of neurodevelopmental impairment require clear and individualized information about what to expect for their child, yet data suggest they have difficulty knowing how to ask for this information. Here, we pilot a Question Prompt List (QPL) with parents of infants at risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. To assess real-time use of the QPL, we recorded family meetings and collected data from parents and clinicians about the QPL experience. Qualitative data were analyzed using directed content analysis. Ten parents were enrolled. In family meetings, clinicians universally acknowledged the QPL and most used the QPL to guide meeting content. All parents who used the QPL found it useful and would recommend the tool to others. In interviews, parents described that the QPL offered novel questions and facilitated more prepared answers from the team. Future studies should test the impact of this QPL on parent understanding and communication quality.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeurodevelopmental DisordersParentsProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationRisk Assessmentcommunicationneonateneurologyquestion prompt list

Identifiers

PMID31137987
PMCPMC7282194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.