Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31137726›Full record

ReviewGenes2019

Preserving Genome Integrity During the Early Embryonic DNA Replication Cycles.

Chames Kermi, Antoine Aze, Domenico Maiorano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neighboring Gulf Killifish (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. DNA repair genes play a variety of roles in the development of fish embryos.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  16. DNA replication timing: Biochemical mechanisms and biological significance.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chames KermiLaboratoire Surveillance et Stabilité du Génome, Institut de Génétique Humaine, UMR9002, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France. kermi@stanford.edu.
Antoine AzeLaboratoire Surveillance et Stabilité du Génome, Institut de Génétique Humaine, UMR9002, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France. antoine.aze@igh.cnrs.fr.
Domenico MaioranoLaboratoire Surveillance et Stabilité du Génome, Institut de Génétique Humaine, UMR9002, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France. domenico.maiorano@igh.cnrs.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the very early stages of embryonic development chromosome replication occurs under rather challenging conditions, including a very short cell cycle, absence of transcription, a relaxed DNA damage response and, in certain animal species, a highly contracted S-phase. This raises the puzzling question of how the genome can be faithfully replicated in such a peculiar metabolic context. Recent studies have provided new insights into this issue, and unveiled that embryos are prone to accumulate genetic and genomic alterations, most likely due to restricted cellular functions, in particular reduced DNA synthesis quality control. These findings may explain the low rate of successful development in mammals and the occurrence of diseases, such as abnormal developmental features and cancer. In this review, we will discuss recent findings in this field and put forward perspectives to further study this fascinating question.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleDNADNA DamageDNA ReplicationEmbryonic DevelopmentGenomeGenomic InstabilityHumansS PhaseDNACaenorabditis elegansDNA damageDNA damage toleranceDrosophila melanogasteriPSCsmouse embryonic stem cellsreplication stressXenopus laeviszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID31137726
PMCPMC6563053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.