Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31137556›Full record

ArticleGenes2019

Comparison of Bacterial Populations in the Ceca of Swine at Two Different Stages and their Functional Annotations.

Himansu Kumar, Woncheol Park, Krishnamoorthy Srikanth, Bong-Hwan Choi, Eun-Seok Cho, Kyung-Tai Lee, Jun-Mo Kim, Kwangmin Kim, Junhyung Park, Dajeong Lim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Himansu KumarDivision of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea. himanshu.genetics@gmail.com.
Woncheol ParkDivision of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea. wcpark1982@korea.kr.
Krishnamoorthy SrikanthDivision of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea. kris87@korea.kr.
Bong-Hwan ChoiDivision of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea. bhchoi@korea.kr.
Eun-Seok ChoSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Cheonan 31000, Korea. djlim@korea.kr.
Kyung-Tai LeeAnimal Genetics and Breeding Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Cheonan 31000, Korea. leekt@korea.kr.
Jun-Mo KimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea. junmokim@cau.ac.kr.
Kwangmin KimBIGS CO. LTD., Hwaseong 18454, Korea. kmkim@3bigs.com.
Junhyung ParkBIGS CO. LTD., Hwaseong 18454, Korea. jhpark@3bigs.com.
Dajeong LimDivision of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea. djlim@korea.kr.
Jong-Eun ParkDivision of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea. jepark0105@korea.kr.
National Institute of Animal Science · KRChung-Ang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial composition in the cecum of pig influences host health, immunity, nutrient digestion, and feeding requirements significantly. Advancements in metagenome sequencing technologies such as 16S rRNAs have made it possible to explore cecum microbial population. In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of cecum microbiota of crossbred Korean native pigs at two different growth stages (stage L = 10 weeks, and stage LD = 26 weeks) using 16S rRNA sequencing technology. Our results revealed remarkable differences in microbial composition, α and β diversity, and differential abundance between the two stages. Phylum composition analysis with respect to SILVA132 database showed

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsBacillotaBacteriaBacteroidetesCecumGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaRepublic of KoreaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, RNASwineAmino AcidsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA sequencingcecum microbiotaSILVA database

Identifiers

PMID31137556
PMCPMC6562920
OpenAlexW2946130571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.