Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31137466›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

The Dark Matter of Large Cereal Genomes: Long Tandem Repeats.

Veronika Kapustová, Zuzana Tulpová, Helena Toegelová, Petr Novák, Jiří Macas, Miroslava Karafiátová, Eva Hřibová, Jaroslav Doležel, Hana Šimková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ancient wheat DNA: How and what for?Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Detection of tandem repeats in the Capsicum annuum genome.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Flow karyotyping of wheat-Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Editorial for Special Issue "Molecular Advances in Wheat and Barley".International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Veronika KapustováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic. kapustova@ueb.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-9937-5667
Zuzana TulpováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic. tulpova@ueb.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-4403-9367
Helena ToegelováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic. toegelova@ueb.cas.cz.
Petr NovákBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic. petr@umbr.cas.cz.
Jiří MacasBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic. macas@umbr.cas.cz.
Miroslava KarafiátováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic. karafiatova@ueb.cas.cz.
Eva HřibováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic. hribova@ueb.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-4344
Jaroslav DoleželInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic. dolezel@ueb.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-6263-0492
Hana ŠimkováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic. simkovah@ueb.cas.cz.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000827Grantová Agentura České Republiky 17-17564S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference genomes of important cereals, including barley, emmer wheat and bread wheat, were released recently. Their comparison with genome size estimates obtained by flow cytometry indicated that the assemblies represent not more than 88-98% of the complete genome. This work is aimed at identifying the missing parts in two cereal genomes and proposing techniques to make the assemblies more complete. We focused on tandemly organised repetitive sequences, known to be underrepresented in genome assemblies generated from short-read sequence data. Our study found arrays of three tandem repeats with unit sizes of 1242 to 2726 bp present in the bread wheat reference genome generated from short reads. However, this and another wheat genome assembly employing long PacBio reads failed in integrating correctly the 2726-bp repeat in the pseudomolecule context. This suggests that tandem repeats of this size, frequently incorporated in unassigned scaffolds, may contribute to shrinking of pseudomolecules without reducing size of the entire assembly. We demonstrate how this missing information may be added to the pseudomolecules with the aid of nanopore sequencing of individual BAC clones and optical mapping. Using the latter technique, we identified and localised a 470-kb long array of 45S ribosomal DNA absent from the reference genome of barley.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantTandem Repeat SequencesChromosomes, PlantHordeumTriticumBACbarleybread wheatgenome assemblyoptical mappingribosomal DNA

Identifiers

PMID31137466
PMCPMC6567227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.