Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31136589›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Pelvic ring injury in the elderly: Fragile patients with substantial mortality rates and long-term physical impairment.

Hester Banierink, Kaj Ten Duis, Rob de Vries, Klaus Wendt, Erik Heineman, Inge Reininga, Frank IJpma

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07636616 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients With FFP1-2 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJunbo LiangRan2026 to 2028Enrolled152ConditionsFragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP)ArmsRobot Assisted Minimally Invasive Fixation
NCT07639619 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Elderly Patients With FFP3-4 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJunbo LiangRan2026 to 2028Enrolled88ConditionsFragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP), OsteoporosisArmsRobot Assisted Minimally Invasive Fixation, Conventional Open Fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Fragility fractures of the pelvis and long-term outcomes among older adults with osteoporosis: a real-world cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Conservative versus operative treatment of LC-1 pelvic ring fractures: radiographic and long-term functional outcomes.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  7. Operative versus non-operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: retrospective evaluation of one-year mortality and in-hospital complications.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinical outcomes in fragility fractures of the pelvis; what can we tell our patients?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Porous threaded titanium implant screws have higher insertional torque compared to standard screws.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Risk Factors for Readmission Following Elderly Low Energy Pelvis Fractures.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  16. Is patient-reported outcome after treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries related to pelvic symmetry? A prospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinically relevant bleeding risk in low-energy fragility fractures of the pelvis in elderly patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hester BanierinkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Trauma Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0030-631X
Kaj Ten DuisUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Trauma Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rob de VriesUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Trauma Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Klaus WendtUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Trauma Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erik HeinemanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Inge ReiningaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Trauma Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frank IJpmaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Trauma Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic ring injuries in the elderly often occur after low-energy accidents. They may result in prolonged immobilization, complications and an intense rehabilitation process. The aim of this study was to assess mortality, physical functioning and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with pelvic ring injuries.

methodsA cross-sectional study was performed including all elderly patients (≥ 65 years) admitted for a pelvic ring injury between 2007-2016. Mortality and survival were evaluated and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used to assess physical functioning (SMFA) and QoL (EQ-5D). These were compared to age-matched normative data from the general Dutch population.

resultsA total of 153 patients, with a mean age of 79 years (SD 8) at the time of injury, were included in this study. The mortality rate was 20% at 30 days, 27% at 1 year and 41% at 3 years of follow-up. All six patients with a type C fracture died within 30 days. Analyses of the 153 patients showed that increasing age, fracture type C and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were all independent risk factors for mortality. Eventually, after excluding patients that died (N = 78) or were unable to contact (N = 2), 73 patients were eligible for follow-up, of which 53 patients (73%) responded. Mean Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores were respectively 67.4 (function index), 65.2 (bother index), 66.5 (lower extremity), 60.4 (activities of daily living) and 68.2 (emotion). Mean EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) score was 0.72. Overall, physical functioning and quality of life were significantly decreased in comparison with normative data from the general population.

conclusionElderly people who sustain a pelvic ring injury should be considered as a fragile population with substantial mortality rates. The patients who survived demonstrated a substantially lower level of physical functioning and quality of life in comparison with their age-matched peers from the general population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMalePelvic BonesRisk FactorsTimeTrauma Severity Indices

Identifiers

PMID31136589
PMCPMC6538139
OpenAlexW2947976521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.