Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31136586›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

MNM and SNM maintain but do not establish achiasmate homolog conjunction during Drosophila male meiosis.

Michael Shoujie Sun, Joe Weber, Ariane C Blattner, Soumya Chaurasia, Christian F Lehner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael Shoujie SunInstitute of Molecular Life Science (IMLS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9359-2268
Joe WeberInstitute of Molecular Life Science (IMLS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5405-8940
Ariane C BlattnerInstitute of Molecular Life Science (IMLS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Soumya ChaurasiaInstitute of Molecular Life Science (IMLS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3949-6552
Christian F LehnerInstitute of Molecular Life Science (IMLS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0185-6049
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first meiotic division reduces genome ploidy. This requires pairing of homologous chromosomes into bivalents that can be bi-oriented within the spindle during prometaphase I. Thereafter, pairing is abolished during late metaphase I, and univalents are segregated apart onto opposite spindle poles during anaphase I. In contrast to canonical meiosis, homologous chromosome pairing does not include the formation of a synaptonemal complex and of cross-overs in spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster. The alternative pairing mode in these cells depends on mnm and snm. These genes are required exclusively in spermatocytes specifically for successful conjunction of chromosomes into bivalents. Available evidence suggests that MNM and SNM might be part of a physical linkage that directly conjoins chromosomes. Here this notion was analyzed further. Temporal variation in delivery of mnm and snm function was realized by combining various transgenes with null mutant backgrounds. The observed phenotypic consequences provide strong evidence that MNM and SNM contribute directly to chromosome linkage. Premature elimination of these proteins results in precocious bivalent splitting. Delayed provision results in partial conjunction defects that are more pronounced in autosomal bivalents compared to the sex chromosome bivalent. Overall, our findings suggest that MNM and SNM cannot re-establish pairing of chromosomes into bivalents if provided after a chromosome-specific time point of no return. When delivered before this time point, they fortify preformed linkages in order to preclude premature bivalent splitting by the disruptive forces that drive chromosome territory formation during spermatocyte maturation and chromosome condensation during entry into meiosis I.

Indexed as

AnaphaseAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatidsChromosome PairingChromosome SegregationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsMaleMeiosisMetaphaseSex ChromosomesSpermatocytesSynaptonemal ComplexTranscription FactorsCell Cycle ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsmod(mdg4) protein, DrosophilaSA-2 protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31136586
PMCPMC6538143
OpenAlexW2947357914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.