Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31136197›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53

Psychometric Properties of the SCARED in a Nationally Representative U.S. Sample of 5-12-Year-Olds.

Stefanie L Sequeira, Jennifer S Silk, William C Woods, David J Kolko, Oliver Lindhiem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating a program to prevent anxiety in children of anxious parents: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Parenting knowledge moderates the association between parent and child internalizing symptoms.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Using Evaluative Criteria to Review Youth Anxiety Measures, Part II: Parent-Report.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefanie L SequeiraDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
Jennifer S SilkDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
William C WoodsDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
David J KolkoWestern Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Oliver LindhiemDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.

Funding

Developing Tools to Assess Parenting SkillsR21HD090145 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LINDHIEM, OLIVER JAMES · 2017 to 2018
$373k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD090145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the factor structure of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders - Parent Report (SCARED-P) in young children and elucidate normative levels of parent-reported anxiety using a nationally representative sample of parents of children ages 5-12 years living in the United States.

methodThe 41-item SCARED-P was administered to parents of 1,570 youth who were selected to match the U.S. population on key demographic variables. SCARED-P model fit and mean score differences by age, race/ethnicity, and sex were assessed.

resultsSCARED-P model fit and subscale reliability appeared almost identical in younger children (ages 5-8) and older children (ages 9-12), although model fit for a five-factor model was poor in both groups. Symptoms of generalized anxiety increased from age 5 to 12, while symptoms of separation anxiety disorder decreased. Parents reported significantly more symptoms of social anxiety in females than males. No significant differences by race/ethnicity were found for mean levels of anxiety or model fit.

conclusionsThe SCARED-P shows some utility as an anxiety screening instrument in a representative sample of U.S. youth as young as 5-years-old, but caution should be used when interpreting subscale scores.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersChildChild, PreschoolEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31136197
PMCPMC6881535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.