Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31136111›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

External validation of nomogram to predict inguinal lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes.

Carlos Vaz de Melo Maciel, Roberto Dias Machado, Mariana Andozia Morini, Pablo Aloisio Lima Mattos, Ricardo Dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis, Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães, Isabela Werneck da Cunha, Eliney Ferreira Faria

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic predictors of lymph node metastasis in penile cancer: a systematic review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk factors for inguinal lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  10. Use of flaps in inguinal lymphadenectomy in metastatic penile cancer.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predictive histopathological factors of nodal metastasis in penile cancer.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Vaz de Melo MacielDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brasil.
Roberto Dias MachadoDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brasil.
Mariana Andozia MoriniDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brasil.
Pablo Aloisio Lima MattosAssociação Piauiense de Combate ao Câncer, Teresina, PI, Brasil.
Ricardo Dos ReisDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brasil.
Rodolfo Borges Dos ReisDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brasil.
Gustavo Cardoso GuimarãesFundação Antonio Prudente, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Isabela Werneck da CunhaFundação Antonio Prudente, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Eliney Ferreira FariaDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brasil.
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRAC Camargo Hospital · BRAssociação Brasileira de Antropologia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPenile cancer (PC) occurs less frequently in Europe and in the United States than in South America and parts of Africa. Lymph node (LN) involvement is the most important prognostic factor, and inguinal LN (ILN) dissection can be curative; however, ILN dissection has high morbidity. A nomogram was previously developed based on clinicopathological features of PC to predict ILN metastases. Our objective was to conduct an external validation of the previously developed nomogram based on our population. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included men with cN0 ILNs who underwent ILN dissection for penile carcinoma between 2000 and 2014. We performed external validation of the nomogram considering three different external validation methods: k-fold, leave-oneout, and bootstrap. We also analyzed prognostic variables. Performance was quantified in terms of calibration and discrimination (receiver operator characteristic curve). A logistic regression model for positive ILNs was developed based on clinicopathological features of PC.

resultsWe analyzed 65 men who underwent ILN dissection (cN0). The mean age was 56.8 years. Of 65 men, 24 (36.9%) presented with positive LNs. A median 21 ILNs were removed. Considering the three different methods used, we concluded that the previously developed nomogram was not suitable for our sample.

conclusionsIn our study, the previously developed nomogram that was applied to our population had low accuracy and low precision for correctly identifying patients with PC who have positive ILNs.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaHumansInguinal CanalLogistic ModelsLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPenile NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53LymphLymphatic MetastasisNomograms

Identifiers

PMID31136111
PMCPMC6837607
OpenAlexW2971175266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.