Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31136039›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2019

Contradiction between amide-CEST signal and pH in breast cancer explained with metabolic MRI.

Erwin Krikken, Wybe J M van der Kemp, Vitaliy Khlebnikov, Thijs van Dalen, Maartje Los, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Peter R Luijten, Maurice A A J van den Bosch, Dennis W J Klomp, Jannie P Wijnen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Imaging Extracellular Acidification and Immune Activation in Cancer.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Erwin KrikkenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9629-604X
Wybe J M van der KempDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1123-2352
Vitaliy KhlebnikovDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Thijs van DalenDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maartje LosDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein/Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter R LuijtenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maurice A A J van den BoschDepartment of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dennis W J KlompDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jannie P WijnenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLOLVG · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetabolic MRI is a noninvasive technique that can give new insights into understanding cancer metabolism and finding biomarkers to evaluate or monitor treatment plans. Using this technique, a previous study has shown an increase in pH during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) treatment, while recent observation in a different study showed a reduced amide proton transfer (APT) signal during NAC treatment (negative relation). These findings are counterintuitive, given the known intrinsic positive relation of APT signal to pH.

methodsIn this study we combined APT MRI and

resultsWhile APT signals have a positive relation to pH and amide content, we observed a direct negative linear correlation between APT signals and pH in breast tumors in vivo.

conclusionsAs differentiation of cancer stages was confirmed by observation of a linear correlation between cell proliferation marker PE/Pi (phosphoethanolamine over inorganic phosphate) and pH in the tumor, our data demonstrates that the concentration of mobile proteins likely supersedes the contribution of the exchange rate to the APT signal.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAmidesBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyProtonsAmidesProtons31P-MRSI7 T MRIAPT CESTbreast cancer

Identifiers

PMID31136039
PMCPMC6772111
OpenAlexW2947034203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.