Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31135997›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

Trends in Prescribed Central Nervous System Depressant Medications Among Adults Who Regularly Consume Alcohol: United States 1999 to 2014.

Jacob T Borodovsky, Melissa J Krauss, Tingying Chi, Laura J Bierut, Richard A Grucza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacob T BorodovskyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-7112-5677
Melissa J KraussDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Tingying ChiDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Laura J BierutDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Richard A GruczaDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Funding

Washington University Psychiatry Residency Research Education ProgramR25MH112473 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NURI B FARBER, Timothy Eric Spiegel · 2018 to 2026
$1.6M
AN EXAMINATION OF AGE-RELATED DISPARITIES IN MEDICATION ASSISTED TREATMENT AND ASSOCIATED OUTCOMESR21DA044744 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIERUT, LAURA J. · 2017 to 2018
$419k
USING TEMPORAL VARIATION IN RISK BEHAVIOR TO UNDERSTAND TRENDS IN ADOLESCENT ALCOHOL MISUSER21AA025689 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRUCZA, RICHARD A · 2018 to 2019
$416k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA025689NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA044744NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH112473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the risks of using central nervous system depressant (CNS-D) medications with alcohol are well documented, little is known about trends in prescribed use of these medications among individuals who regularly consume alcohol (i.e., trends in "concurrent use"). We examined changes in the prevalence of prescribed CNS-D medications among individuals who drank alcohol on 52 or more occasions in the past year ("regular drinking"). CNS-D medications included sedative-hypnotics (subclassified as anxiolytics or sleep medications) and opioids.

methodsWe used 8 cross-sectional cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2000 to 2013-2014) from participants aged 20 and older (n = 37,709). We used log-binomial regression to examine (i) prevalence trends of prescribed CNS-D medication use, (ii) trend differences by drinking status, and (iii) correlates of CNS-D medication use.

resultsAmong those who drink regularly, the relative annual increase in prevalence of sedative-hypnotic use was 5.3% (95% CI: 2.7 to 7.9): Anxiolytic and sleep medication use increased annually by 3.7% (95% CI: 0.8 to 6.7) and 11.2% (95% CI: 6.5 to 16.0), respectively. Opioid use trends among those who drink regularly were not statistically significant but were nonlinear. Differences in CNS-D medication trends between those who drink regularly and those who drink infrequently/abstain were not statistically significant. Those who drink regularly were less likely than those who drink infrequently/abstain to use opioids (adjusted relative risk [ARR]: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.78) and anxiolytics (ARR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.81), but not sleep medications (ARR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.35). Those aged 40 and older were 2 to 5 times as likely as those aged 20 to 29 to use sedative-hypnotics.

conclusionsAmong those who drink regularly, the prevalence of prescribed sedative-hypnotic use increased and prescribed opioid use remained common. These trends indicate that a substantial portion of the population is at risk of alcohol-related adverse drug reactions-particularly those aged 40 and older.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System DepressantsAdultAgedAge FactorsAlcohol DrinkingAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Anxiety AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSocioeconomic FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Anxiety AgentsCentral Nervous System DepressantsHypnotics and SedativesAlcoholBenzodiazepineOpioidSleep MedicationTrends

Identifiers

PMID31135997
PMCPMC6602821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.