ReviewThe New phytologist2020
Genetic modification to improve disease resistance in crops.
Review in The New phytologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
103 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular basis of azole fungicide interactions with human estrogen receptor alpha (ERα): an integrated in silico and in vitro toxicological assessment.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Lactiplantibacillus plantarum as a Biosafe Microbial Bridge in the Gut-Environment Continuum.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Humic Acid-Derived Carbon Dots Promote Soybean Growth via Enhancing Photosynthesis and Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis ofBiology · 2026Article
- Microbial consortia and drought tolerance- A paradigm shift towards agro-ecological sustainability.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Potent Bacteriostatic Activity of a Naphthalene-2-Acyl Imidazolium Salt against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.The plant pathology journal · 2026Article
- Synthetic Biology of Plants and Microbes for Agriculture, Environment, and Future Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Plant Biotic Stress: Tools and Techniques for Crop Protection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Calcium-containing inorganic immunity booster drives the enrichment of specific root endophytic microbiota against Ralstonia solanacearum.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Exploring fern pathosystems and immune receptors to bridge gaps in plant immunity.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Hacking the immune system: plant immune protease engineering for crop protection.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Enhancing melatonin biosynthesis in crops through synthetic genetic circuits: A strategy for nutritional fortification in soybean and stress resistance in cotton.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Discovery of functional NLRs using expression level, high-throughput transformation and large-scale phenotyping.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Cultivating awareness: How botanical gardens can foster public engagement with plant pathogens.PLoS pathogens · 2025Review
- Farmers' intention to continue Bt brinjal adoption in Bangladesh: pre and post-adoption drivers.Transgenic research · 2025Article
- The endoglucanase gene LOC_Os09g23084 is involved in rice development and susceptibility to sheath rot disease.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Emerging Fungal Pathogens Warfare, Fungi-Like Organisms, and the World's Major Crops: Lessons from the Past and Solutions for the Future.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Development and application of a cost-effective multiplex Kompetitive Allele-Specific polymerase chain reaction assay for pyramiding resistant genes of fusarium head blight and powdery mildew in wheat.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Determination of the method of induction of mutations byMethodsX · 2025Article
43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant pathogens are a significant challenge in agriculture despite our best efforts to combat them. One of the most effective and sustainable ways to manage plant pathogens is to use genetic modification (GM) and genome editing, expanding the breeder's toolkit. For use in the field, these solutions must be efficacious, with no negative effect on plant agronomy, and deployed thoughtfully. They must also not introduce a potential allergen or toxin. Expensive regulation of biotech crops is prohibitive for local solutions. With 11-30% average global yield losses and greater local impacts, tackling plant pathogens is an ethical imperative. We need to increase world food production by at least 60% using the same amount of land, by 2050. The time to act is now and we cannot afford to ignore the new solutions that GM provides to manage plant pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.