Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31135882›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

A study of deep learning approaches for medication and adverse drug event extraction from clinical text.

Qiang Wei, Zongcheng Ji, Zhiheng Li, Jingcheng Du, Jingqi Wang, Jun Xu, Yang Xiang, Firat Tiryaki, Stephen Wu, Yaoyun Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qiang WeiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Zongcheng JiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Zhiheng LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Jingcheng DuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jingqi WangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jun XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yang XiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Firat TiryakiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Stephen WuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yaoyun ZhangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cui TaoSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Advancing Cancer Pharmacoepidemiology Research Through EHRs and InformaticsU24CA194215 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI, YANG, PING · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
Real-time Disambiguation of Abbreviations in Clinical NotesR01LM010681 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI XU, HUA · 2010 to 2017
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NCI NIH HHS U24 CA194215NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article presents our approaches to extraction of medications and associated adverse drug events (ADEs) from clinical documents, which is the second track of the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) shared task. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe clinical corpus used in this study was from the MIMIC-III database and the organizers annotated 303 documents for training and 202 for testing. Our system consists of 2 components: a named entity recognition (NER) and a relation classification (RC) component. For each component, we implemented deep learning-based approaches (eg, BI-LSTM-CRF) and compared them with traditional machine learning approaches, namely, conditional random fields for NER and support vector machines for RC, respectively. In addition, we developed a deep learning-based joint model that recognizes ADEs and their relations to medications in 1 step using a sequence labeling approach. To further improve the performance, we also investigated different ensemble approaches to generating optimal performance by combining outputs from multiple approaches.

resultsOur best-performing systems achieved F1 scores of 93.45% for NER, 96.30% for RC, and 89.05% for end-to-end evaluation, which ranked #2, #1, and #1 among all participants, respectively. Additional evaluations show that the deep learning-based approaches did outperform traditional machine learning algorithms in both NER and RC. The joint model that simultaneously recognizes ADEs and their relations to medications also achieved the best performance on RC, indicating its promise for relation extraction.

conclusionIn this study, we developed deep learning approaches for extracting medications and their attributes such as ADEs, and demonstrated its superior performance compared with traditional machine learning algorithms, indicating its uses in broader NER and RC tasks in the medical domain.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMachine LearningNarrationPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparationsadverse drug eventsdeep learningelectronic health recordsnamed entity recognitionrelation extraction

Identifiers

PMID31135882
PMCPMC6913210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.