ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2019
Enabling mesenchymal stromal cell immunomodulatory analysis using scalable platforms.
Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peptoid-Cross-Linked Hydrogel Stiffness Modulates Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Immunoregulatory Potential in the Presence of Interferon-Gamma.Macromolecular bioscience · 2024Article
- Controlling placental spheroid growth and phenotype using engineered synthetic hydrogel matrices.Biomaterials science · 2024Article
- Review
- Advanced Technologies for Potency Assay Measurement.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- High-Throughput On-Chip Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Potency Prediction.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) are a promising cell source for numerous regenerative medicine and cell therapy-based applications. However, MSC-based therapies have faced challenges in translation to the clinic, in part due to the lack of sufficient technologies that accurately predict MSC potency and are viable in the context of cell manufacturing. Microfluidic platforms may provide an innovative opportunity to address these challenges by enabling multiparameter analyses of small sample sizes in a high throughput and cost-effective manner, and may provide a more predictive environment in which to analyze hMSC potency. To this end, we demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating 3D culture environments into microfluidic platforms for analysis of hMSC secretory response to inflammatory stimuli and multi-parameter testing using cost-effective and scalable approaches. We first find that the cytokine secretion profile for hMSCs cultured within synthetic poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels is significantly different compared to those cultured on glass substrates, both in growth media and following stimulation with IFN-γ and TNF-α, for cells derived from two donors. For both donors, perfusion with IFN-γ and TNF-α leads to differences in secretion of interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 8 (IL-8), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) between hMSCs cultured in hydrogels and those cultured on glass substrates. We then demonstrate the feasibility of analyzing the response of hMSCs to a stable concentration gradient of soluble factors such as inflammatory stimuli for potential future use in potency analyses, minimizing the amount of sample required for dose-response testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.