Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31135485›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2019

PD-L1 Expression in Urothelial Carcinoma With Predominant or Pure Variant Histology: Concordance Among 3 Commonly Used and Commercially Available Antibodies.

Henning Reis, Rene Serrette, Jennifer Posada, Vincent Lu, Ying-Bei Chen, Anuradha Gopalan, Samson W Fine, Satish K Tickoo, Sahussapont J Sirintrapun, Gopa Iyer and 9 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Biomarkers and testing in pathology.Current opinion in urology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Henning ReisInstitute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Rene SerretteDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Jennifer PosadaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Vincent LuDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Ying-Bei ChenDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Anuradha GopalanDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Samson W FineDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Satish K TickooDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Sahussapont J SirintrapunDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Gopa IyerDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Samuel A FuntDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Min Yuen TeoDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Jonathan E RosenbergDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Dean F BajorinDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Guido DalbagniDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Bernard H BochnerDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
David B SolitDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Victor E ReuterDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Hikmat A Al-AhmadieDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE in Bladder CancerP50CA221745 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI OSTROVNAYA, IRINA · 2018 to 2024
$11.8M
MSK Paul Calabresi Career Development Award for Clinical OncologyK12CA184746 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Omar Abdel-Wahab, Simon N. Powell · 2015 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA184746NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has transformed the management of advanced bladder cancer (BC). Despite its limitations, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry may serve as a predictive biomarker of anti-PD-L1/PD1 therapy. While urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients with predominant or pure variant histology (UCV) account for up to one-third of advanced cases, to date, most ICB BC studies have excluded patients with such histologies. To assess the potential utility of ICB in patients with UCV, we analyzed PD-L1 expression in UCV and compared 3 commonly used and commercially available PD-L1 antibodies. Full sections from 84 UCV cases were stained with clones SP263, 22C3, and SP142, all of which are considered predictive assays to identify UC patients who are more likely to respond to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors durvalumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, respectively. Expression on tumor cells (TC) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) was assessed. Staining extent and characteristics were evaluated, and concordance among the 3 clones was determined at various cutoff points as used in previous studies in BC. We found that PD-L1 was expressed in a significant percentage of UCV cases at different cutoff points (cutoff 1% TC: 37% to 54%, cutoff 5% TC: 23% to 37%), with the highest expression in UC with squamous differentiation. These figures are equal to or higher than those for classic/pure UC (4% to 30%). The results suggest that patients with UCV may benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and argue against the exclusion of UC with predominant or pure variant histology from clinical ICB studies. The highest expression in both TC and IC was observed with clone SP263, followed by 22C3 and SP142, and all clones showed strong agreement in a pairwise comparison, both in TC and IC (R-values: 0.780 to 0.901), which indicates that all 3 clones are potentially useful in the evaluation of PD-L1 expression in UCV.

Indexed as

Antibody SpecificityImmunohistochemistryAntibodiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUrologic NeoplasmsUrotheliumAntibodiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31135485
PMCPMC6561805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.