Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31135323›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2019

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using Social Media Platforms to Locate and Track Research Participants.

Ananya Bhatia-Lin, Alexandra Boon-Dooley, Michelle K Roberts, Caroline Pronai, Dylan Fisher, Lea Parker, Allison Engstrom, Leah Ingraham, Doyanne Darnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trends in Clinical Information Systems Research in 2019.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Community-Sourced Reporting of Mortalities in Angelman Syndrome (1979-2022).American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Standards for clinical trials for treating TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. [The Early Mobilization Network].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Ethics of Recruiting Research Subjects Through Social Media.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ananya Bhatia-Lina University of Washington School of Medicine.
Alexandra Boon-Dooleya University of Washington School of Medicine.
Michelle K Robertsa University of Washington School of Medicine.
Caroline Pronaib National Institute of Mental Health.
Dylan Fishera University of Washington School of Medicine.
Lea Parkera University of Washington School of Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5389-849X
Allison Engstroma University of Washington School of Medicine.
Leah Ingrahama University of Washington School of Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5422-6705
Doyanne Darnella University of Washington School of Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-8774

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory SupplementU54AT007748 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, LESLEY H, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2012 to 2017
$15.1M
A Policy Relevant US Trauma Care System Pragmatic Trial for PTSD and ComorbidityUH3MH106338 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZATZICK, DOUGLAS F · 2015 to 2018
$5.5M
A Policy Relevant US Trauma Care System Pragmatic Trial for PTSD and ComorbidityUH2MH106338 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZATZICK, DOUGLAS F · 2014 to 2014
$782k
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT007748NIMH NIH HHS UH2 MH106338NIMH NIH HHS UH3 MH106338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As social media becomes increasingly popular, human subjects researchers are able to use these platforms to locate, track, and communicate with study participants, thereby increasing participant retention and the generalizability and validity of research. The use of social media; however, raises novel ethical and regulatory issues that have received limited attention in the literature and federal regulations. We review research ethics and regulations and outline the implications for maintaining participant privacy, respecting participant autonomy, and promoting researcher transparency when using social media to locate and track participants. We offer a rubric that can be used in future studies to determine ethical and regulation-consistent use of social media platforms and illustrate the rubric using our study team's experience with Facebook. We also offer recommendations for both researchers and institutional review boards that emphasize the importance of well-described procedures for social media use as part of informed consent.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchHealth Records, PersonalResearch SubjectsCommunicationHumansInformed ConsentOnline Social NetworkingPrivacyResearch DesignSocial Mediaethicsfollow-upinformed consentprivacyresearchsocial media

Identifiers

PMID31135323
PMCPMC7183769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.