ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Deep fusion of contextual and object-based representations for delineation of multiple nuclear phenotypes.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- CD36International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationNuclear delineation and phenotypic profiling are important steps in the automated analysis of histology sections. However, these are challenging problems due to (i) technical variations (e.g. fixation, staining) that originate as a result of sample preparation; (ii) biological heterogeneity (e.g. vesicular versus high chromatin phenotypes, nuclear atypia) and (iii) overlapping nuclei. This Application-Note couples contextual information about the cellular organization with the individual signature of nuclei to improve performance. As a result, routine delineation of nuclei in H&E stained histology sections is enabled for either computer-aided pathology or integration with genome-wide molecular data.
resultsThe method has been evaluated on two independent datasets. One dataset originates from our lab and includes H&E stained sections of brain and breast samples. The second dataset is publicly available through IEEE with a focus on gland-based tissue architecture. We report an approximate AJI of 0.592 and an F1-score 0.93 on both datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code-base, modified dataset and results are publicly available. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.