Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134872›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2019

Obese women's perceptions of weight gain during pregnancy: a theory-based analysis.

Emily M Nagourney, Dina Goodman, Yukyan Lam, Kristen M Hurley, Janice Henderson, Pamela J Surkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Experiences of Food Insecurity During Pregnancy in High-Income Countries: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Influence of Appetite and Perceived Ability to Control Cravings on Excessive Gestational Weight Gain.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily M NagourneyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205,USA.
Dina GoodmanDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205,USA.
Yukyan LamDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205,USA.
Kristen M HurleyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205,USA.
Janice HendersonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine,Baltimore, MD,USA.
Pamela J SurkanDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205,USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0334-5931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExcess gestational weight gain (GWG) in obese women is linked to adverse maternal outcomes and is particularly pervasive among African Americans, who have the highest obesity rates in the USA. A better understanding of culturally relevant attitudes and perceptions of GWG is needed to develop targeted interventions to prevent excess GWG among this group.

designUsing the constructs of Social Cognitive Theory, we explored attitudes and perceptions surrounding diet and exercise among low-income obese African-American pregnant women in Baltimore. We conducted twenty-one semi-structured in-depth interviews with pregnant adult women.

settingParticipants were recruited from a referral clinic for obese pregnant women at a large urban hospital in Baltimore, MD, USA.

participantsTwenty-one low-income African-American adult females in the first two trimesters of pregnancy with BMI > 30·0 kg/m2.

resultsLack of knowledge was not the main obstacle to healthy behaviours during pregnancy. Rather, food cravings and fatigue, an unhealthy physical food environment, limited self-efficacy for controlling excessive GWG, and a lack of adequate emotional and informational support impacted women's agency. While digital technology was discussed as a vehicle to promote maintenance of a healthy weight in pregnancy, further research is needed to test how it can be used to empower women to engage in healthy behaviours during pregnancy.

conclusionInterventions to prevent excess GWG among African-American pregnant women should harness support from partners and family and must go beyond sharing of clinical knowledge to also include strategies that improve the food environment, diet quality and self-efficacy.

Indexed as

AdultBaltimoreBlack or African AmericanDietExerciseFemaleGestational Weight GainHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansObesityPerceptionPovertyPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleAfrican-American womenGestational weight gainObesityPregnancySocial Cognitive Theory

Identifiers

PMID31134872
PMCPMC10260617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.