Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134866›Full record

Trial reportGlobal health action2019

Rural response system to prevent violence against women: methodology for a community randomised controlled trial in the central region of Ghana.

Adolphina A Addo-Lartey, Deda Ogum Alangea, Yandisa Sikweyiya, Esnat D Chirwa, Dorcas Coker-Appiah, Rachel Jewkes, Richard M K Adanu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Global health action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adolphina A Addo-Larteya Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, School of Public Health , University of Ghana , Accra , Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-8852-7189
Deda Ogum Alangeab Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health , University of Ghana , Accra , Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-7496-8514
Yandisa Sikweyiyac Gender and Health Research Unit , South African Medical Research Council , Pretoria , South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7153-5828
Esnat D Chirwac Gender and Health Research Unit , South African Medical Research Council , Pretoria , South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0471-4978
Dorcas Coker-Appiahd Gender Studies and Human Rights Documentation Centre , Accra , Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-6409-1330
Rachel Jewkesc Gender and Health Research Unit , South African Medical Research Council , Pretoria , South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4330-6267
Richard M K Adanub Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health , University of Ghana , Accra , Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-8053-6793
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Violence against women (VAW) is common in Ghana, with nation-wide surveys reporting high prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) (physical, sexual and/or emotional violence). Our trial assesses the community level impact of the Rural Response System which uses Community-Based Action Teams 'COMBAT' for preventing VAW in Ghana. This study is a mixed method unmatched cluster randomised controlled trial and includes rural (n = 23), peri-urban (n = 7) and urban (n = 10) communities in four districts of the Central Region, Ghana. The trial will last three years with one baseline survey, one impact assessment and a qualitative baseline, midpoint and endline evaluation. A total of 40 localities were selected to serve as clusters (20 per trial arm) with about 82 households per cluster recruited at baseline. The same number will be recruited post-intervention. Adult women (18 to 49 years) and men (≥ 18 years) were drawn from different localities. Sampling of households within a community was random and done using a computerised system. In each selected household, one female or male resident was invited to participate. Individuals are eligible for inclusion in the study if they usually live (sleep and eat) in the household, have lived in the community for at least a year, and are between the ages of 18-to-49 years old. Our impact assessment component will compare past 12 months incidence of IPV (i.e. IPV experiences for women and perpetration of physical and/or sexual IPV for men) between arms in the trial. The implementation of this community trial comes at an opportune time when evidence on the effectiveness of a targeted VAW intervention in the Ghanaian society is needed to inform the development of national policies for preventing VAW. Our progressive research approach using a mixed method design will further extend knowledge globally on a multifaceted intervention to reduce the incidence of intimate partner violence in a developing country.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity Health ServicesFemaleGhanaHealth PromotionHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMiddle AgedRural Health ServicesRural PopulationYoung Adultcluster randomised controlled trialcommunity-based action teamscommunity interventiongender-based violenceimpact assessmentIntimate partner violence

Identifiers

PMID31134866
PMCPMC6542181
OpenAlexW2947457622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.