ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019
Engaging patients in primary care design: An evaluation of a novel approach to codesigning care.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Co-Design to Quality Improvement: Using the Double Diamond Framework to Develop Primary Care Redesign Priorities for Hypertension Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluating patient participation in value-based healthcare: Current state and lessons learned.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Enhancing primary care through integrated care pathways: a convergence of theory and practice.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Evaluation of an Innovative Colon Capsule Endoscopy Service in Scotland From the Perspective of Patients: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Article
- Development of a patient and clinician co-led education program to promote living well with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Insights from a pilot project.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Co-produced capability framework for successful patient and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: results of a scoping review.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Article
- Patient partners' perspectives of meaningful engagement in synthesis reviews: A patient-oriented rapid review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Review
- Improving the experience of older people with colorectal and breast cancer in patient-centred cancer care pathways using experience-based co-design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Engaging patients in primary care design: An evaluation of a novel approach to codesigning care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
- Engagement of older adults with multimorbidity as patient research partners: Lessons from a patient-oriented research program.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRecognition is growing that to create truly patient-centred care, health-care organizations need to partner with patients around care design. More research into the benefits of engaging patients and the most effective ways of partnering with them is needed.
methodsThis study assessed the process and impact of a collaborative effort to design a new clinic service that balanced the number of patient and clinical provider/staff codesigners involved and recruited patients to represent diverse perspectives. Data sources included interviews with participants, event observation and participant surveys.
resultsOur evaluation found that including patients as equal partners improved the design process by infusing a real-world, patient perspective. The pre-event orientation and interactive methods used in the event fostered positive collaboration, as well as personal growth for the patient codesigners.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the feasibility and benefits of including a roughly equal number of patients and clinical providers/staff in design events and ensuring that the patients represent diverse perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.