Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134713›Full record

Trial reportDevelopmental science2020

The academic outcomes of working memory and metacognitive strategy training in children: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Jonathan S Jones, Fraser Milton, Mohammod Mostazir, Anna R Adlam

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Developmental science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan S JonesSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0333-5212
Fraser MiltonSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Mohammod MostazirSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Anna R AdlamSchool of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GBMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Economic and Social Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_UP_A060_1103Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory training has been shown to improve performance on untrained working memory tasks in typically developing children, at least when compared to non-adaptive training; however, there is little evidence that it improves academic outcomes. The lack of transfer to academic outcomes may be because children are only learning skills and strategies in a very narrow context, which they are unable to apply to other tasks. Metacognitive strategy interventions, which promote metacognitive awareness and teach children general strategies that can be used on a variety of tasks, may be a crucial missing link in this regard. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 95 typically developing children aged 9-14 years were allocated to three cognitive training programmes that were conducted daily after-school. One group received Cogmed working memory training, another group received concurrent Cogmed and metacognitive strategy training, and the control group received adaptive visual search training, which better controls for expectancy and motivation than non-adaptive training. Children were assessed on four working memory tasks, reading comprehension, and mathematical reasoning before, immediately after, and 3 months after training. Working memory training improved working memory and mathematical reasoning relative to the control group. The improvements in working memory were maintained 3 months later, and these were significantly greater for the group that received metacognitive strategy training, compared to working memory training alone. Working memory training is a potentially effective educational intervention when provided in addition to school; however, future research will need to investigate ways to maintain academic improvements long term and to optimize metacognitive strategy training to promote far-transfer. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/-7MML48ZFgw.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessLearningMemory, Short-TermMetacognitionAdolescentChildComprehensionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMathematicsReadingchildrenmathematicsmetacognitive strategyreadingworking memoryworking memory training

Identifiers

PMID31134713
PMCPMC7379186
OpenAlexW2944498864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.