ArticleGenes & genomics2019
Correction to: Hair follicles transcriptome profiles in Bashang long-tailed chickens with different plumage colors.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic dissection of leg and back feather follicle density in yellow-feathered broiler: integrative GWAS and transcriptome analysis reveal the regulatory role of SERPINF1.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Combined transcriptomics and proteomics forecast analysis for potential genes regulating the Columbian plumage color in chickens.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The words 'hair follicles' was replaced with 'feather follicles' in the title and the main text.
Identifiers
31134593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.