Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134473›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2020

Intra-community infanticide in wild, eastern chimpanzees: a 24-year review.

Adriana E Lowe, Catherine Hobaiter, Caroline Asiimwe, Klaus Zuberbühler, Nicholas E Newton-Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Primates 2021 Social Impact Award.Primates; journal of primatology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Maternal cannibalism in two populations of wild chimpanzees.Primates; journal of primatology · 2020
    Article
  13. Responses to death and dying: primates and other mammals.Primates; journal of primatology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adriana E LoweLiving Primates Research Group, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. adriana.e.lowe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4720-0769
Catherine HobaiterCentre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3893-0524
Caroline AsiimweBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.
Klaus ZuberbühlerBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-088X
Nicholas E Newton-FisherLiving Primates Research Group, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. n.e.newton-fisher@kent.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-2641

Funding

University of Kent 50th Anniversary Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infanticide is well documented in chimpanzees and various hypotheses have been proposed to explain this behavior. However, since infanticide by chimpanzees is relatively rare, it has thus far not been possible to thoroughly test these hypotheses. Here we present an analysis of the largest dataset of infanticides from a single community of chimpanzees, a full record of all intra-community infanticides and failed attempts at infanticide over a 24-year period for the Sonso community of chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest, Uganda. We use these data to test four hypotheses for this behavior: the sexual selection hypothesis, male mating competition, resource competition, and meat acquisition. Our dataset consisted of 33 attacks on 30 victims, 11 of which were 'definite' infanticides, four of which 'almost certain', and nine were 'suspected', while nine were 'attempted' infanticides. The majority of attacks where the perpetrators were known (23) had only male attackers and victims were disproportionately young (two-thirds of victims with known ages were under 1 week old). Our data best support the sexual selection hypothesis for infanticide. Cannibalism was infrequent and partial, suggesting meat acquisition was a by-product of infanticide, and there was no evidence to suggest that infanticide was part of a male strategy to eliminate future competitors. Infanticide by females was rare, but we suggest sexual selection, operating through intra-sexual competition, may also be responsible for infanticide by females.

Indexed as

CannibalismAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMalePan troglodytesUgandaAggressionBudongoInfanticidePan troglodytesSexual selection

Identifiers

PMID31134473
PMCPMC6971177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.