ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2019
Spatiotemporal discrimination in attractor networks with short-term synaptic plasticity.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibitory-stabilization is sufficient for history-dependent computation in a randomly connected attractor network.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Inhibitory-stabilization is sufficient for history-dependent computation in a randomly connected attractor network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Co-existence of synaptic plasticity and metastable dynamics in a spiking model of cortical circuits.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Co-existence of synaptic plasticity and metastable dynamics in a spiking model of cortical circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Multistability in neural systems with random cross-connections.Biological cybernetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Biological constraints on neural network models of cognitive function.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Attractor-state itinerancy in neural circuits with synaptic depression.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We demonstrate that a randomly connected attractor network with dynamic synapses can discriminate between similar sequences containing multiple stimuli suggesting such networks provide a general basis for neural computations in the brain. The network contains units representing assemblies of pools of neurons, with preferentially strong recurrent excitatory connections rendering each unit bi-stable. Weak interactions between units leads to a multiplicity of attractor states, within which information can persist beyond stimulus offset. When a new stimulus arrives, the prior state of the network impacts the encoding of the incoming information, with short-term synaptic depression ensuring an itinerancy between sets of active units. We assess the ability of such a network to encode the identity of sequences of stimuli, so as to provide a template for sequence recall, or decisions based on accumulation of evidence. Across a range of parameters, such networks produce the primacy (better final encoding of the earliest stimuli) and recency (better final encoding of the latest stimuli) observed in human recall data and can retain the information needed to make a binary choice based on total number of presentations of a specific stimulus. Similarities and differences in the final states of the network produced by different sequences lead to predictions of specific errors that could arise when an animal or human subject generalizes from training data, when the training data comprises a subset of the entire stimulus repertoire. We suggest that such networks can provide the general purpose computational engines needed for us to solve many cognitive tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.