Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31134433›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2019

Spatiotemporal discrimination in attractor networks with short-term synaptic plasticity.

Benjamin Ballintyn, Benjamin Shlaer, Paul Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin BallintynNeuroscience Program, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.
Benjamin ShlaerDepartment of Physics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Paul MillerNeuroscience Program, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA. pmiller@brandeis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9280-000X

Funding

Undergraduate and Graduate Training in Computational NeuroscienceT90DA032435 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, PAUL · 2011 to 2020
$1.6M
A hierarchy of timescales for switching between states of neural activity during consumption decisionsR01NS104818 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, DONALD B, MILLER, PAUL · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
CRCNS: Cortical network models of taste processing: dynamics and plasticityR01DC009945 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, PAUL · 2008 to 2012
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS T90 DA032435NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009945NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We demonstrate that a randomly connected attractor network with dynamic synapses can discriminate between similar sequences containing multiple stimuli suggesting such networks provide a general basis for neural computations in the brain. The network contains units representing assemblies of pools of neurons, with preferentially strong recurrent excitatory connections rendering each unit bi-stable. Weak interactions between units leads to a multiplicity of attractor states, within which information can persist beyond stimulus offset. When a new stimulus arrives, the prior state of the network impacts the encoding of the incoming information, with short-term synaptic depression ensuring an itinerancy between sets of active units. We assess the ability of such a network to encode the identity of sequences of stimuli, so as to provide a template for sequence recall, or decisions based on accumulation of evidence. Across a range of parameters, such networks produce the primacy (better final encoding of the earliest stimuli) and recency (better final encoding of the latest stimuli) observed in human recall data and can retain the information needed to make a binary choice based on total number of presentations of a specific stimulus. Similarities and differences in the final states of the network produced by different sequences lead to predictions of specific errors that could arise when an animal or human subject generalizes from training data, when the training data comprises a subset of the entire stimulus repertoire. We suggest that such networks can provide the general purpose computational engines needed for us to solve many cognitive tasks.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAnimalsCognitionComputer SimulationDecision MakingElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansLong-Term Synaptic DepressionMachine LearningMental RecallNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSynapsesAttractorsDecision-makingSequence encodingSynaptic depression

Identifiers

PMID31134433
PMCPMC6571095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.